Commit ad5bd8f
committed
bgpd: With suppress-fib-pending ensure withdrawal is sent
When you have suppress-fib-pending turned on it is possible
to end up in a situation where the prefix is not withdrawn
from downstream peers.
Here is the timing that I believe is happening:
a) have 2 paths to a peer.
b) receive a withdrawal from 1 path, set BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING
and send the route install to zebra.
c) receive a withdrawal from the other path.
d) At this point we have a dest->flags set BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING
old_select the path_info going away, new_select is NULL
e) A bit further down we call group_announce_route() which calls
the code to see if we should advertise the path. It sees the
BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING flag and says, nope.
f) the route is sent to zebra to withdraw, which unsets the
BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING.
g) This function winds up and deletes the path_info. Dest now
has no path infos.
h) BGP receives the route install(from step b) and unsets the
BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING flag
i) BGP receives the route removed from zebra (from step f) and
unsets the flag again.
We know if there is no new_select, let's go ahead and just
unset the PENDING flag to allow the withdrawal to go out
at the time when the second withdrawal is received.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>1 parent 483fa56 commit ad5bd8f
1 file changed
+6
-0
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
3895 | 3895 | | |
3896 | 3896 | | |
3897 | 3897 | | |
| 3898 | + | |
| 3899 | + | |
| 3900 | + | |
| 3901 | + | |
| 3902 | + | |
| 3903 | + | |
3898 | 3904 | | |
3899 | 3905 | | |
3900 | 3906 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments