Description
Is there an existing issue for this?
- I have searched the existing issues
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe the problem.
I am trying to create a project following the Domain-Driven Design (DDD) approach (to solve several problems in complex domains). Most of the time when writing the model/entity using this approach, people will avoid primitives for IDs (for example: UserId
for User
or RoleId
for Role
).
Until I tried to extend the existing IdentityUser
and IdentityRole
for example to something like this:
// ApplicationUser.cs
public class ApplicationUser : IdentityUser<UserId>
{
}
// ApplicationRole.cs
public class ApplicationRole : IdentityRole<RoleId>
{
}
Then I stuck into the problem when I tried to update the ApplicationDbContext
:
public class AppDbContext(DbContextOptions<AppDbContext> options) : IdentityDbContext<ApplicationUser, ApplicationRole, UserId>(options) // Here is the problem TKey will be applied to Role as well
{
}
Describe the solution you'd like
Rather than using all the TKey for all base class like here, the TKey could be specified for each type or base class.
public class AppDbContext(DbContextOptions<AppDbContext> options) : IdentityDbContext<ApplicationUser<UserId>, ApplicationRole<RoleId>>(options)
{
}
Or probably the team considered the pros and cons for every data type that is applied to the primary key and then decided to use another data type for every type or base class (in this case using primitives, int auto increment vs guid):
public class AppDbContext(DbContextOptions<AppDbContext> options) : IdentityDbContext<ApplicationUser<int>, ApplicationRole<Guid>>(options)
{
}
Additional context
No response