Skip to content

JIT: consider boosting priority of GC type temps when sorting to determine tracked set #12073

Open
@AndyAyersMS

Description

@AndyAyersMS

Idea that was prompted by dotnet/aspnetcore#7724.

If we fail to track a GC temp, we incur an extra prolog cost to zero the temp. Seems like we should include this zeroing as an explicit extra weighted cost factor in the sort functionWtdRefCntCmp. Currently GCness is only used as a tiebreaker if weighted costs match.

category:cq
theme:basic-cq
skill-level:beginner
cost:medium

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    JitUntriagedCLR JIT issues needing additional triagearea-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMIoptimization

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions