Mono packages are missing a few files

[mmitche]

<AssetMapping Id="Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.ios-arm64" Type="Package">
      <DiffFile>C:\scratch\vmr-compare\vmr-assets\PackageArtifacts\Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.ios-arm64.10.0.0-preview.3.25156.108.nupkg</DiffFile>
      <BaseFile>C:\scratch\vmr-compare\non-vmr-assets\runtime\shipping\packages\Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.ios-arm64.10.0.0-preview.3.25155.15.nupkg</BaseFile>
      <EvaluationErrors />
      <Issues>
        <Issue Type="MissingPackageContent" Description="Package 'Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.ios-arm64' is missing the following files in the VMR: runtimes/ios-arm64/native/Mono.release.framework/Info.plist" />
        <Issue Type="MissingPackageContent" Description="Package 'Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.ios-arm64' is missing the following files in the VMR: runtimes/ios-arm64/native/Mono.release.framework/Mono" />
        <Issue Type="MissingPackageContent" Description="Package 'Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.ios-arm64' is missing the following files in the VMR: runtimes/ios-arm64/native/Mono.debug.framework/Info.plist" />
        <Issue Type="MissingPackageContent" Description="Package 'Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.ios-arm64' is missing the following files in the VMR: runtimes/ios-arm64/native/Mono.debug.framework/Mono" />
      </Issues>
    </AssetMapping>

[ViktorHofer]

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/066ee9764c5acd29226c54b06ed78e892256d685/src/mono/mono.proj#L1166-L1177

I love these Exists('...') checks. Don't copy the file if it doesn't exist - silently exclude it.

[ViktorHofer]

@akoeplinger any idea what's causing these files to not exist in the VMR build?

[akoeplinger]

hm no that's pretty weird

the reason for the Exists checks is that they only exist in specific build configurations.

[ViktorHofer]

the reason for the Exists checks is that they only exist in specific build configurations

I think it would be better to condition these includes on whether building for those specific build configurations. That would avoid silently skipping the files but the expected list would need to be kept up-to-date of course.

hm no that's pretty weird

Would you mind taking a look? You are the mono subset infra expert :)

[akoeplinger]

I think it would be better to condition these includes on whether building for those specific build configurations.

Sure, it's one of these quick hacks that survive longer than expected :)

Will take a look.