Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi! #291 maybe somewhat related to this (though Java-specific). Another thought more specifically on the auth - I think that the "centralized service layer" you are describing sounds pretty similar to a Kerberos server (perhaps with a non-trivial setup). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
If you want credentials vending and this sort of stuff, iceberg rest Catalog is a better option for now |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello everyone,
First off, I'm really excited about the potential of DuckLake. The concept is fantastic.
I have a question regarding the current architecture for security and access control. My understanding is that the DuckDB client requires direct credentials for both the object storage backend (e.g., S3) and the PostgreSQL metadata store. In a multi-user environment, providing every client with direct, long-lived credentials can pose security and management challenges.
This led me to wonder if there are any plans or thoughts around introducing a centralized service layer. Such a service could act as a broker:
I realize it's still early days for the project, but I believe this architectural pattern could be crucial for adoption in larger, security-conscious organizations.
Has this been discussed before, or what are the community's thoughts on this topic?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions