Geometry type support for DuckLake spec #83
houstonwarren
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Just in case you don't notice this is already filed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi team,
Thanks for all your work on DuckLake — I’ve been trying it out and it’s been fantastic so far. Really refreshing coming from the Iceberg world.
Given that Parquet now supports geometry/geography types, Iceberg has recently added native geo types, and DuckDB offers strong spatial support via its extension, I’m wondering if there are any plans to add a geometry type to the DuckLake spec?
Is its current absence due to the pure SQL-based catalog design, where only certain backends support spatial extensions?
Geometry support would be a killer feature for me and would make DuckLake an ideal fit for geospatial work given the strength of DuckDB in that area. Appreciate any insights — and thanks again for the great work!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions