[DEPENDANCY] llhttp instead of http-parser

[Brynanum]

Current state

In dependancies, r2modman use http-parser.

Why it's an issue

This one is no longer maintained, and will be removed from official repositories with time.

It's already the case on ArchLinux (current workaround: a user keep it available on AUR, even if it can be considered as a "unsafe" package).

Other Linux distributions will follow about removing it (example with Fedora here).

Wanted state

In dependancies, r2modman use llhttp instead.

More details on readme file of llhttp. It also explains why http-parser redirect on llhttp now, by also performing better on loads.

[mikebriggs2k]

I'd like to second this issue. I attempted to install on Arch and it complained about the missing dependency. Switching would be desired.

[dreamingweasel]

I'll third this issue, per: https://archlinux.org/todo/move-to-llhttp-from-http-parser/

http-parser has been unmaintained for ages and nodejs now uses llhttp. Fedora is working on removing http-parser and replacing it upstream in http-parser dependent packages so lets do the same.

[1] nodejs/http-parser#522
[2] https://github.com/nodejs/llhttp
[3] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/466TNSUQW454A2WSDONN2EYKHFM2S3IK/

Where possible switch to llhttp, if not please create an tracking issue upstream. We can likely keep http-parser around for a while.

http-parser is in AUR but it seems like it's not the "suggested" package for this anymore and llhttp should be used in its place.