Skip to content

should the screen attribute in Layout really be optional? #32

@tomjnixon

Description

@tomjnixon

In the EAR reference code, the screen is always present, but set to some default dimensions if not specified.

Handling the case where there is no screen (and skipping screen-related processing) might be desirable, but is non-standard -- should we get rid of the boost::optional wrapper (changing the API), or just set it to a default value and complain if it's reset to boost::none by the user?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions