Skip to content

documentation for 'new' models; better docs for 'old' models #1439

Open
@sbenthall

Description

There are now two kinds of models in the HARK repository:

  • (A) Ones in `HARK/ConsumptionSaving', which are of the original style
  • (B) Ones in HARK/model, which are of a new style, based on blocks and working towards HARK 1.0/2.0

The models in (B) make their 'equations' clear by virtue of the fact that that's all they are -- collections of model data that is, effectively, their equations. But they do not yet have rendered autodocs because I forgot to write them, and because I'm uncertain about the documentation standards.

The models in (A) have autodocs rendered to Sphinx. But these docs do not contain the model equations. If these equations are anywhere, they are in example notebooks, maybe? This seems less than ideal, since it would be nice to know what equations a model was working with.

This is related to #1292 and #479 and the general idea that it should be possible to find something like the equations for the models in HARK.

I guess the concrete proposal is that we agree to include model equations in model documentation.

I would then go add docs for the 'new' models.

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions