|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: post |
| 3 | +title: "ChemSpider and the RSC: where next?" |
| 4 | +date: 2009-05-15 |
| 5 | +blogger-link: https://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2009/05/chemspider-and-rsc-where-next.html |
| 6 | +doi: 10.59350/a00pn-pjt64 |
| 7 | +tags: cheminf chemspider opendata |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +Last Monday the [CHMINF-L](http://www.indiana.edu/~cheminfo/network.html) brought the news to me that [ChemSpider](http://chemspider.com/) |
| 11 | +was acquired by the [RSC](http://rsc.org/) (not the [press release](http://rsc.org/AboutUs/News/PressReleases/2009/ChemSpider.asp)). |
| 12 | +[Twitter](http://twitter.com/) ([my Twitter post](http://twitter.com/egonwillighagen/statuses/1763364256)) and |
| 13 | +[FriendFeed](http://friendfeed.com/) (see [this series](http://friendfeed.com/search?q=chemspider+rsc&friends=egonw)). |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Reading blogs used to be to get the news, but this has changed. Still, blogging gives more freedom, more space. Blogs did soon |
| 16 | +follow. [Chris](http://www.steinbeck-molecular.de/steinblog/) was the first to |
| 17 | +[blog about it](http://www.steinbeck-molecular.de/steinblog/index.php/2009/05/11/chemspider-bought-by-the-royal-society-of-chemistry/): |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +> This is great news and I’m confident that it will be a move to even more openess in chemistry and cheminformatics. |
| 20 | +> It will also allow the RSC to use Tony fantastic tools for even more semantic markup of articles. I’m looking forward |
| 21 | +> to talking to everyone about the implications. For now, congratulations, Tony, and congratulations, RSC, for this |
| 22 | +> great deal. |
| 23 | +
|
| 24 | +I think [Tony](http://www.chemspider.com/blog/) himself [was next](http://www.chemspider.com/blog/the-royal-society-of-chemistry-acquires-chemspider.html): |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +> This is good for us for a number of reasons. Specifically we will no longer have to deal with our very significant |
| 27 | +> resource limitations but more than that it lends credence and validation to the work that we have been doing over the |
| 28 | +> past 2 years. It seems so long ago now but ChemSpider was first unveiled to the world at the ACS Spring meeting 2007. |
| 29 | +> What began then only as a hobby project is now being recognized by the community as one of the primary resources for |
| 30 | +> internet chemistry. |
| 31 | +
|
| 32 | +His network and insight in required data curation is what I think made ChemSpider a success. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +Later views followed from [Peter](http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=1891), [Rich](http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?p=1829) and |
| 35 | +[Neil](http://blogs.nature.com/thescepticalchymist/2009/05/the_rsc_and_chemspider.html). I have only congratulations, |
| 36 | +which I hereby join, and expect that only future will tell us if our cheers are correct. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +## Where next? |
| 39 | +As Tony indicated, the deal will practically mean better support for ChemSpider in terms of computing power, making if |
| 40 | +easier for them to make upgrades, hence better uptime, etc. It may, indeed, also mean more data, provided from RSC archives, |
| 41 | +as [suggested by Neil](http://blogs.nature.com/thescepticalchymist/2009/05/the_rsc_and_chemspider.html). More practically, I |
| 42 | +can imagine seeing Project Prospect contributing *InChI-DOI* links to ChemSpider very soon. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +And this would be one of the two recommendations I have to ChemSpider at this moment: |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +1. now linked to a publisher, and with both text mining efforts and expertise, focus on these InChI-DOI links, and, in |
| 47 | + particular, focus on those InChI-DOI links which involve papers that describe measured properties of the molecules; |
| 48 | +2. with the increased support, finish the Open Data work done, by making it easy for people to download the |
| 49 | + ChemSpider-OpenData subset. This, I believe, is crucial for a wider adoption in the OpenData community, as OpenData |
| 50 | + which is practically made impossible to easily download is not Open enough. Previous priorities may have been focused |
| 51 | + on setting up a viable commercial alternative, but with the RSC backing, this can no longer be a reason to not do this. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +Once more, congratulations to the ChemSpider-team and the involved RSC people, and very much looking forward to seeing |
| 54 | +how this will change chemistry for the better! |
0 commit comments