Skip to content

Commit 5822d73

Browse files
committed
Ported another post
1 parent eae9a2f commit 5822d73

1 file changed

Lines changed: 54 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 54 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
1+
---
2+
layout: post
3+
title: "ChemSpider and the RSC: where next?"
4+
date: 2009-05-15
5+
blogger-link: https://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2009/05/chemspider-and-rsc-where-next.html
6+
doi: 10.59350/a00pn-pjt64
7+
tags: cheminf chemspider opendata
8+
---
9+
10+
Last Monday the [CHMINF-L](http://www.indiana.edu/~cheminfo/network.html) brought the news to me that [ChemSpider](http://chemspider.com/)
11+
was acquired by the [RSC](http://rsc.org/) (not the [press release](http://rsc.org/AboutUs/News/PressReleases/2009/ChemSpider.asp)).
12+
[Twitter](http://twitter.com/) ([my Twitter post](http://twitter.com/egonwillighagen/statuses/1763364256)) and
13+
[FriendFeed](http://friendfeed.com/) (see [this series](http://friendfeed.com/search?q=chemspider+rsc&friends=egonw)).
14+
15+
Reading blogs used to be to get the news, but this has changed. Still, blogging gives more freedom, more space. Blogs did soon
16+
follow. [Chris](http://www.steinbeck-molecular.de/steinblog/) was the first to
17+
[blog about it](http://www.steinbeck-molecular.de/steinblog/index.php/2009/05/11/chemspider-bought-by-the-royal-society-of-chemistry/):
18+
19+
> This is great news and I’m confident that it will be a move to even more openess in chemistry and cheminformatics.
20+
> It will also allow the RSC to use Tony fantastic tools for even more semantic markup of articles. I’m looking forward
21+
> to talking to everyone about the implications. For now, congratulations, Tony, and congratulations, RSC, for this
22+
> great deal.
23+
24+
I think [Tony](http://www.chemspider.com/blog/) himself [was next](http://www.chemspider.com/blog/the-royal-society-of-chemistry-acquires-chemspider.html):
25+
26+
> This is good for us for a number of reasons. Specifically we will no longer have to deal with our very significant
27+
> resource limitations but more than that it lends credence and validation to the work that we have been doing over the
28+
> past 2 years. It seems so long ago now but ChemSpider was first unveiled to the world at the ACS Spring meeting 2007.
29+
> What began then only as a hobby project is now being recognized by the community as one of the primary resources for
30+
> internet chemistry.
31+
32+
His network and insight in required data curation is what I think made ChemSpider a success.
33+
34+
Later views followed from [Peter](http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=1891), [Rich](http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?p=1829) and
35+
[Neil](http://blogs.nature.com/thescepticalchymist/2009/05/the_rsc_and_chemspider.html). I have only congratulations,
36+
which I hereby join, and expect that only future will tell us if our cheers are correct.
37+
38+
## Where next?
39+
As Tony indicated, the deal will practically mean better support for ChemSpider in terms of computing power, making if
40+
easier for them to make upgrades, hence better uptime, etc. It may, indeed, also mean more data, provided from RSC archives,
41+
as [suggested by Neil](http://blogs.nature.com/thescepticalchymist/2009/05/the_rsc_and_chemspider.html). More practically, I
42+
can imagine seeing Project Prospect contributing *InChI-DOI* links to ChemSpider very soon.
43+
44+
And this would be one of the two recommendations I have to ChemSpider at this moment:
45+
46+
1. now linked to a publisher, and with both text mining efforts and expertise, focus on these InChI-DOI links, and, in
47+
particular, focus on those InChI-DOI links which involve papers that describe measured properties of the molecules;
48+
2. with the increased support, finish the Open Data work done, by making it easy for people to download the
49+
ChemSpider-OpenData subset. This, I believe, is crucial for a wider adoption in the OpenData community, as OpenData
50+
which is practically made impossible to easily download is not Open enough. Previous priorities may have been focused
51+
on setting up a viable commercial alternative, but with the RSC backing, this can no longer be a reason to not do this.
52+
53+
Once more, congratulations to the ChemSpider-team and the involved RSC people, and very much looking forward to seeing
54+
how this will change chemistry for the better!

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)