-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
First Draft ELISA Criteria Evaluation doc #53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
A preview of 476b516 is here: |
fwuehr1995
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
|
@reiterative - are you good with this now? |
|
@petebrink - please add a license to the file and add your signed-off-by to the pull request |
|
@petebrink If you would like to have this published on the website, it would need to be in the /docs folder and be added to the the nav section in mkdocs.yml - or you can leave it where it is for now and then we can move it there in a follow up. |
This (incomplete) document is intended to establish both a process and criteria for the evaluation of documentation submitted to ELISA. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
Added changes to criteria and grammatical fixes from PR. Updated Version update section for readability Updated document review entry condition criteria. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
…iteria. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
e8ae013 to
d36a072
Compare
|
Closing to get updated comments addressed. |
This (incomplete) document is intended to establish both a process and criteria for the evaluation of documentation submitted to ELISA.