-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Petebrink/doc eval criteria #54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
🪓 PR closed, deleted preview content from gh-pages |
|
This is looking good to go, but to satisfy the LF DCO requirements all commits need to be signed by the committer. This is easy to remedy if you only have one commit, but because you have multiple commits on your branch you will need to use an interactive rebase. Here are the steps to do this (assuming that you wish to squash all of your commits into a single commit):
Squashing all your commits in an interactive rebase Running command 3 above will open a temporary file ( This is a list of all the commits on your branch, with the (short-form) commit hashes for each. To 'squash' your commits into to a single commit
So for the above example, the updated temporary file would be: Other interactive rebase alternatives If you wanted to keep all (or some) of your commits, then you could instead change Or, you could use 'e' (or 'edit') to edit a commit, allowing you to run command 4 and then run the following to proceed: IMPORTANT NOTE If you ever get into a mess with a rebase, you can abort it by running: This will take you back to where you started, with (hopefully) no harm done. |
|
@petebrink Note that I updated the previous comment to include:
I also added this to the Wiki (as a temporary home): https://github.com/elisa-tech/wg-osep/wiki/Pull-Request-guidance |
3d3698c to
d91f8ae
Compare
reiterative
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The updated PR branch looks good to me. My only niggle is that the commit message now contains all of the accumulated history of changes from the squashed commits. I typically remove these and simply have one message describing the resultant set of changes contained in this commit.
This (incomplete) document is intended to establish both a process and criteria for the evaluation of documentation submitted to ELISA. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]> Updated with feedback Added changes to criteria and grammatical fixes from PR. Updated Version update section for readability Updated document review entry condition criteria. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]> Added Review Ratings section with ratings and explanations. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]> Added NA criterion, Added further checklist questions to cover all criteria. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]> Updated with feedback from review. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]> Final updates for first draft. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]> Added license. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]> Moved Evaluation Criteria document to the docs directory. Added Document Criteria to main page. Added Document Criteria to main page. Signed-off-by: Pete Brink <[email protected]>
d91f8ae to
abb6a7f
Compare
Closed previous pull request. Updated document contains additional modifications and the license.