[Discussion]Feature request: S3 compatible object storage support as backend storage

[Mike-Solar]

Just for discussion: will it be better for using S3 compatible object storage as backend storage? These services provide very large spaces.

I really need this because in my country, it's hard to get a public IP address. We need complex settings to access the NAS in our office. I think it will be better to move this to the cloud.

Self hosted on cloud is still not meaningless. It saves a lot of cost.

Maybe I will submit a pull request for this these days.

[elonen]

Note: in #110 (and associated fixes in v0.9.2) mounted Google GCP buckets were tested and working, so if storage and not direct download is required, that's a possible solution, too.