You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been playing around with EmDash using the Starter template and got curious about the memory usage, so I did a quick side-by-side test on the same Mac.
Using pnpm dev, so the measurement also includes the PNPM wrapper process.
Plain Astro: ~380 MB
EmDash: ~1.5 GB
So it's roughly 4x more.
I understand EmDash is doing quite a bit more than a plain Astro project, with the admin, database, plugins, content APIs, etc. So I wouldn't expect it to be as light. But 1.5 GB did make me wonder whether this is expected in dev mode especially when editing Astro files on a VPS often with only 1GB RAM.
Maybe I'm looking at it the wrong way, but it would be interesting to hear how others are seeing this.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I've been playing around with EmDash using the Starter template and got curious about the memory usage, so I did a quick side-by-side test on the same Mac.
Using
pnpm dev, so the measurement also includes the PNPM wrapper process.Plain Astro: ~380 MB
EmDash: ~1.5 GB
So it's roughly 4x more.
I understand EmDash is doing quite a bit more than a plain Astro project, with the admin, database, plugins, content APIs, etc. So I wouldn't expect it to be as light. But 1.5 GB did make me wonder whether this is expected in dev mode especially when editing Astro files on a VPS often with only 1GB RAM.
Maybe I'm looking at it the wrong way, but it would be interesting to hear how others are seeing this.
All reactions