Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Fine by me, I generally prefer calver. I do think we need to be careful about breaking changes on event years, but we don't need semver to do that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
AFAIK we're never going to support an older version of the badge firmware, and our response to anyone who has an issue with one will be that they should update to the latest and try first
This pushes me fairly heavily towards moving our releases to be calver - so the releases would be something like YYYY.MM.MICRO
this means we don't have to worry as much about semantics and having 'enough' things to push a new release - we can just push a release when we want.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions