Some times you have two jinja variables that in reality represent the same but you have to use different names for it to work since you are referering to different instances. Suggest that if you add an underscore to name of the jinja variable, the extension should understand and map this to the variable without underscore.
Example:
Here the extension should map the {{ _Wellname }}To{{ _Line1 }} to {{ Wellname }}To{{ Line1 }} so that references can be tracked. In case of renaming the underscore should be keept for this instance and support updating the non-jinja part.
Some times you have two jinja variables that in reality represent the same but you have to use different names for it to work since you are referering to different instances. Suggest that if you add an underscore to name of the jinja variable, the extension should understand and map this to the variable without underscore.
Example:
Here the extension should map the
{{ _Wellname }}To{{ _Line1 }}to{{ Wellname }}To{{ Line1 }}so that references can be tracked. In case of renaming the underscore should be keept for this instance and support updating the non-jinja part.