Continue SSP scenarios in ECHAM / AWI-ESM beyond 2100 #1319
-
|
Hi all, I would like to conduct "stabilization runs" with AWI-ESM-2.6 in which I would like to continue the simulation after an SSP scenario beyond 2100 for several decades. By default, all forcings and boundary conditions should be kept at the 2100 values and the model is just running freely into a new dynamic equilibrium state. The desired way of doing this, would be, that it is possible to combine I would appreciate any advice on how to approach this. I could imagine that @christian-stepanek @pgierz or @chrisdane might have previous experiences with this? Thanks & Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 11 replies
-
|
I could imagine three ways how this could work. They would come with different levels of complexity of implementation:
If the necessity to run this kind of simulation would not likely occur regularly, I probably would stick to solution 1. It is a bit ugly, but how to run a simulation with fixed greenhouse forcing is a "three-liner" in namelist.echam. Or did I overlook the need for other modifications beyond the constant setting of greenhouse gases? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I changed jsbach.datasets.yaml as below: I cannot attach the yaml file here. Try to compare with the one in your esm_tools to see the differences. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi Jan Sorry for the late reply. To me thats two problems.
feature of the esm_tools as in Pengyangs example above. For testing you can use your own e.g. Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi! Thank you all for your contributions. This starts to feel like a nicely connected community :) Ineed, as @PengyangSong mentioned, the I would add to this, that it is best if you add this syntax directly to your runscript as: jsbach:
add_forcing_sources:
"${input_dir}/${echam.resolution}/New_Hampshire_LCC/${echam.scenario}_harvest/LUH_harvest_${echam.resolution}_2099.nc":
from: 2100meaning, any change you would have to do in the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I changed jsbach.datasets.yaml as below: