There is a structural mismatch between the hub repo's dummy-package…
espanso-hub/packages $ exa --tree dummy-package
dummy-package
└── 0.1.0
├── _manifest.yml
├── package.yml
└── README.md
… and this repo:
espanso/dummy-repository $ exa --tree dummy-package
dummy-package
├── _manifest.yml
├── package.yml
└── README.md
The latter is implied by:
But the former is correct as per https://espanso.org/docs/packages/creating-a-package/#publish-on-the-hub-public and all hub packages seem to comply:
espanso-hub/packages $ exa --tree --level=2 | rg '│ └── ' | sort | uniq
│ └── 0.1.0 │ └── 0.1.1 │ └── 0.1.2 │ └── 0.2.0 │ └── 0.2.1
│ └── 1.0.0 │ └── 1.7.0 │ └── 2.0.0 │ └── 2.0.1
Another but: Both structures seems to work with Espanso v2.1.6-beta.
Therefore
- Should this
dummy-repository be archived or deleted or its ReadMe clarified?
- Does that version subfolder need to be mentioned in Package format, in a nutshell? Or is it a special case of the multiple versions format which however, everyone on the hub uses at this time?
There is a structural mismatch between the hub repo's
dummy-package…… and this repo:
The latter is implied by:
But the former is correct as per https://espanso.org/docs/packages/creating-a-package/#publish-on-the-hub-public and all hub packages seem to comply:
Another but: Both structures seems to work with Espanso v2.1.6-beta.
Therefore
dummy-repositorybe archived or deleted or its ReadMe clarified?