Suggest more NimBLE CI checks to cover more configurations (IDFGH-14906)

[bryghtlabs-richard]

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Each IDF v5.1.x update past v5.1.3 has been tricky due to integration issues between ESP-IDF and ESP-NimBLE.

Describe the solution you'd like.

I'd like to suggest building NimBLE several different ways, just to do a compile-check.

First, I'd like to suggest 8 builds, 4 with one each of these modes enabled, and another 4 with all enabled except one a time. These should cover #15157 and #15617 :

CONFIG_BT_NIMBLE_ROLE_CENTRAL=?
CONFIG_BT_NIMBLE_ROLE_BROADCASTER=?
CONFIG_BT_NIMBLE_ROLE_OBSERVER=?
CONFIG_BT_NIMBLE_ROLE_PERIPHERAL=?

Next, I'd like to suggest 4 more builds, with one of the above disabled, and the others enabled.

Suggest a build with all roles enabled, but CONFIG_BT_NIMBLE_SECURITY_ENABLE disabled to cover espressif/esp-nimble#78

Suggest a builds cover extended advertising on/off: espressif/esp-nimble#81

Describe alternatives you've considered.

No response

Additional context.

NimBLE is very flexible, and that's a good thing, but complicates verifying it builds in all configurations.

[rahult-github]

Hi @bryghtlabs-richard , thanks for the feedback. We do have CI tests to check for different flag combinations. Will add up the suggestion in our existing framework.