[flang][OpenMP] Improve locality check when determining DSA (llvm#180583)

Follow-up to llvm#178739.

The locality check assumed that immediately after the initial symbol
resolution (i.e. prior to the OpenMP code in resolve-directives.cpp),
the scope that owns a given symbol is the scope which owns the symbol's
storage. Turns out that this isn't necessarily true as illustrated by
the included testcase, roughly something like:
```
program main
  integer :: j        ! host j (storage-owning)
  contains
  subroutine f
    !$omp parallel    ! scope that owns j, but j is host-associated
    do j = ...
    end do
    !$omp end parallel
  end
end program
```

In such cases, the locality should be checked for the symbol that owns
storage, i.e. a clone of the symbol that is has been privatized or a
symbol that is not host- or use-associated. This is similar to obtaning
the ultimate symbol (i.e. from the end of association chain), except the
chain traversal would stop at a privatized symbol, potentially before
reaching the end.

This fixes a few regressions in the Fujitsu test suite:
Fujitsu/Fortran/0160/Fujitsu-Fortran-0160_0000.test
Fujitsu/Fortran/0160/Fujitsu-Fortran-0160_0012.test
Fujitsu/Fortran/0160/Fujitsu-Fortran-0160_0013.test
Fujitsu/Fortran/0660/Fujitsu-Fortran-0660_0096.test
Fujitsu/Fortran/0660/Fujitsu-Fortran-0660_0097.test
Fujitsu/Fortran/1052/Fujitsu-Fortran-1052_0108.test
Fujitsu/Fortran/1052/Fujitsu-Fortran-1052_0112.test

Author: kparzysz

flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-directives.cpp

@@ -421,15 +421,51 @@ class OmpAttributeVisitor : DirectiveAttributeVisitor<llvm::omp::Directive> {
         ultSym.flags().test(Symbol::Flag::InCommonBlock);
   }
 
+  static const Symbol &GetStorageOwner(const Symbol &symbol) {
+    static auto getParent = [](const Symbol *s) -> const Symbol * {
+      if (auto *details{s->detailsIf<UseDetails>()}) {
+        return &details->symbol();
+      } else if (auto *details{s->detailsIf<HostAssocDetails>()}) {
+        return &details->symbol();
+      } else {
+        return nullptr;
+      }
+    };
+    static auto isPrivate = [](const Symbol &symbol) {
+      static const Symbol::Flags privatizing{Symbol::Flag::OmpPrivate,
+          Symbol::Flag::OmpFirstPrivate, Symbol::Flag::OmpLastPrivate,
+          Symbol::Flag::OmpLinear};
+      return (symbol.flags() & privatizing).any();
+    };
+
+    const Symbol *sym = &symbol;
+    while (true) {
+      if (isPrivate(*sym)) {
+        return *sym;
+      }
+      if (const Symbol *parent{getParent(sym)}) {
+        sym = parent;
+      } else {
+        return *sym;
+      }
+    }
+    llvm_unreachable("Error while looking for storage owning symbol");
+  }
+
   // Recognize symbols that are not created as a part of the OpenMP data-
   // sharing processing, and that are declared inside of the construct.
   // These symbols are predetermined private, but they shouldn't be marked
   // in any special way, because there is nothing to be done for them.
   // They are not symbols for which private copies need to be created,
   // they are already themselves private.
   static bool IsLocalInsideScope(const Symbol &symbol, const Scope &scope) {
-    return symbol.owner() != scope && scope.Contains(symbol.owner()) &&
-        !HasStaticStorageDuration(symbol);
+    // A symbol that is marked with a DSA will be cloned in the construct
+    // scope and marked as host-associated. This applies to privatized symbols
+    // as well even though they will have their own storage. They should be
+    // considered local regardless of the status of the original symbol.
+    const Symbol &actual{GetStorageOwner(symbol)};
+    return actual.owner() != scope && scope.Contains(actual.owner()) &&
+        !HasStaticStorageDuration(actual);
   }
 
   template <typename A> void Walk(const A &x) { parser::Walk(x, *this); }

…est/Semantics/OpenMP/local-variables.f90 …t/Semantics/OpenMP/local-variables-1.f90flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/local-variables.f90 renamed to flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/local-variables-1.f90 flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/local-variables.f90 renamed to flang/test/Semantics/OpenMP/local-variables-1.f90

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+!RUN: %flang_fc1 -fdebug-unparse-with-symbols -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=60 %s | FileCheck %s
+
+! Shortened version of Fujitsu/Fortran/0160/0160_0000.f90
+! Make sure that j is privatized.
+
+!CHECK-LABEL: !DEF: /MAIN MainProgram
+!CHECK-NEXT:  program MAIN
+!CHECK-NEXT:   implicit none
+!CHECK-NEXT:   !DEF: /MAIN/j ObjectEntity INTEGER(4)
+!CHECK-NEXT:   !DEF: /MAIN/k ObjectEntity INTEGER(4)
+!CHECK-NEXT:   !DEF: /MAIN/ndim ObjectEntity INTEGER(4)
+!CHECK-NEXT:   integer j, k, ndim
+!CHECK-NEXT:   !DEF: /MAIN/flux (Subroutine) Subprogram
+!CHECK-NEXT:   call flux
+!CHECK-NEXT:  contains
+!CHECK-NEXT:   !REF: /MAIN/flux
+!CHECK-NEXT:   subroutine flux
+!CHECK-NEXT:  !$omp parallel
+!CHECK-NEXT:  !$omp do
+!CHECK-NEXT:    !DEF: /MAIN/flux/OtherConstruct1/OtherConstruct1/k (OmpPrivate, OmpPreDetermined) HostAssoc INTEGER(4)
+!CHECK-NEXT:    !DEF: /MAIN/flux/OtherConstruct1/OtherConstruct1/ndim HostAssoc INTEGER(4)
+!CHECK-NEXT:    do k=-1,ndim+1
+!CHECK-NEXT:     !DEF: /MAIN/flux/OtherConstruct1/OtherConstruct1/j (OmpPrivate, OmpPreDetermined) HostAssoc INTEGER(4)
+!CHECK-NEXT:     !REF: /MAIN/flux/OtherConstruct1/OtherConstruct1/ndim
+!CHECK-NEXT:     do j=-1,ndim+1
+!CHECK-NEXT:     end do
+!CHECK-NEXT:    end do
+!CHECK-NEXT:  !$omp end do
+!CHECK-NEXT:  !$omp end parallel
+!CHECK-NEXT:   end subroutine flux
+!CHECK-NEXT:  end program MAIN
+
+program main
+  implicit none
+  integer :: j, k, ndim
+
+  call flux()
+
+  contains
+
+    subroutine flux
+      !$omp parallel
+      !$omp do
+      do k = -1, ndim + 1
+        do j = -1, ndim + 1
+        enddo
+      enddo
+      !$omp end do
+      !$omp end parallel
+    end subroutine flux
+
+end program main