diff --git a/.lycheerc.toml b/.lycheerc.toml index df49c2a..634e0f6 100644 --- a/.lycheerc.toml +++ b/.lycheerc.toml @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ exclude = [ # Quarto's site intermittently refuses lychee connections on GitHub runners. "https://quarto.org/", "https://quarto.org/docs/reference/projects/websites.html", + # Other frequently timing out URLs + "https://info.orcid.org/event/", + "https://ukb.nl/", + "https://www.uu.nl/staff/", ] exclude_path = [ diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index 9cf6783..b7785da 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -24,6 +24,18 @@ Thanks for considering a contribution. For tagged releases, also run `npm run release:prepare -- --tag vX.Y.Z` and commit the generated archive before publishing the release so Zenodo captures the rendered site snapshot. +## Quarto builds + +Use the npm scripts or call Quarto through `uv run`; do not call `quarto` directly. + +| Task | npm script | Direct Quarto command | Configuration | +| --------------------- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | +| Render the website | `npm run render` | `uv run quarto render` | `_quarto.yml` | +| Preview the website | `npm run preview` | `uv run quarto preview` | `_quarto.yml` | +| Render with fork URLs | `npm run render:fork` | `uv run quarto render --profile fork` | `_quarto.yml` + untracked `_quarto-fork.yml` | +| Export DOCX | `npm run docx` | `uv run quarto render --profile docx` | `_quarto.yml` + `_quarto-docx.yml` | +| Render poster PDFs | `npm run pdf` | `uv run quarto render --profile pdf` | `_quarto.yml` + `_quarto-pdf.yml` | + ## Content contributions - Blog entries must follow the folder-per-entry structure described in `AGENTS.md`. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index b54de1f..c3408f3 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -52,12 +52,24 @@ This repository includes a dedicated Quarto profile in `_quarto-docx.yml`. ```bash npm run docx +# or: uv run quarto render --profile docx ``` Output file: - `_site-docx/NAIF-Website-Export.docx` +### Render all posters to PDF + +This repository includes a dedicated Quarto profile in `_quarto-pdf.yml`. + +```bash +npm run pdf +# or: uv run quarto render --profile pdf +``` + +Poster PDFs are written next to each poster source, for example `posters//poster.pdf`. + ### Validate before opening a PR Run all checks (formatting, linting, type checking, tests, render, rendered link checks) in one go: @@ -97,8 +109,24 @@ Zenodo will archive. | `npm run preview` | `uv run quarto preview` | Local dev server with live reload | | `npm run preview:fork` | `uv run quarto preview --profile fork` | Preview locally with fork-specific URLs | | `npm run docx` | `uv run quarto render --profile docx` | Export site to a single DOCX | +| `npm run pdf` | `uv run quarto render --profile pdf` | Render all poster sources to PDF | | `npm run site:build` | `render` + `jampack` | Build the optimised release site | +#### Quarto configuration files + +| File | Used by | Purpose | +| -------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | +| `_quarto.yml` | `npm run render`, `npm run preview` | Main website configuration and shared HTML rendering settings | +| `_quarto-docx.yml` | `npm run docx` | DOCX export profile for site pages, posts, and events | +| `_quarto-pdf.yml` | `npm run pdf` | PDF export profile for all poster sources under `posters/**` | +| `_quarto-fork.yml.example` | Manual template | Template for local fork-specific URLs | +| `_quarto-fork.yml` | `--profile fork` commands | Untracked local fork overrides; copy from the example file | +| `posters/**/_quarto.yml` | Individual poster directories | Standalone `docposter` configuration for rendering one poster | + +Always invoke Quarto through `uv run`, either directly or via the npm scripts above. Quarto profiles +are selected with `--profile `, which makes Quarto merge `_quarto-.yml` into the base +configuration for that command. + #### Code quality | Script | Command | Description | diff --git a/_quarto-pdf.yml b/_quarto-pdf.yml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7723e66 --- /dev/null +++ b/_quarto-pdf.yml @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +project: + type: default + render: + - "posters/**/poster.qmd" + - "!posters/index.qmd" + post-render: + - _extensions/bbucior/docposter/R/chrome_pdf.R + +format: + docposter-html: + fill-page: true + embed-resources: true diff --git a/events/2026-05-06-science-at-noon-verlaessliches-wissen-sichern/index.qmd b/events/2026-05-06-science-at-noon-verlaessliches-wissen-sichern/index.qmd index e377328..be0317b 100644 --- a/events/2026-05-06-science-at-noon-verlaessliches-wissen-sichern/index.qmd +++ b/events/2026-05-06-science-at-noon-verlaessliches-wissen-sichern/index.qmd @@ -19,13 +19,17 @@ toc: true +::: {.callout-note} +This event has already taken place. Any registration information has been disabled and is shown for reference only. +::: + ## Details - Date: Wednesday, 6 May 2026 - Time: 13:15-14:15 - Location: Haus der Akademien, Raum Eiger, first floor, Laupenstrasse 7, 3008 Bern - Language: German -- Registration: (via the embedded registration form on the event page) +- Registration: ~~`https://akademien-schweiz.ch/agenda/science-at-noon-verlaessliches-wissen-sichern-forschungsinfrastrukturen-in-zeiten-von-ki-und-desinformation`~~ (via the embedded registration form on the event page) - Event page: ## About diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index e87e962..6b00058 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ "release:prepare": "npm run site:build && npm run site:archive -- --stage", "render": "uv run quarto render", "render:fork": "uv run quarto render --profile fork", + "pdf": "uv run quarto render --profile pdf", "screenshot:clean": "node scripts/screenshot-clean.mjs", "screenshot:install-browsers": "npx playwright install chromium", "site:archive": "uv run python scripts/release_site_archive.py", diff --git a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/.gitignore b/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/.gitignore deleted file mode 100644 index ad29309..0000000 --- a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/.gitignore +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ -/.quarto/ -**/*.quarto_ipynb diff --git a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/_quarto.yml b/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/_quarto.yml deleted file mode 100644 index 8da546f..0000000 --- a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/_quarto.yml +++ /dev/null @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ -# Setting up the default project metadata for `quarto use` -# per https://quarto.org/docs/extensions/project-types.html#project-type-extension - -project: - title: "BiblioCon 2026 poster" - type: docposter - post-render: - # Also convert the poster html output to pdf. - # Comment out this chrome_pdf.R step if only the html output is desired. - - _extensions/bbucior/docposter/R/chrome_pdf.R - -format: - docposter-html: - fill-page: true - embed-resources: true diff --git a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/custom.css b/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/custom.css deleted file mode 100644 index 0aa6d42..0000000 --- a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/custom.css +++ /dev/null @@ -1,95 +0,0 @@ -/* Use this file to override styles in the drposter template. - * - * Improve poster maintainability by keeping the resources separate - * from the package, and user styles separated from the overall package. - */ - -/* NAIF Colors from base_colors.scss */ -:root { - --naif-strong-highlight: #A1AB71; - --naif-light-highlight: #E8E1D0; - --naif-body-color: #181818; - --naif-body-bg: white; -} - -/* Import Inter font from Google Fonts */ -@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&display=swap'); - -/* Apply Inter font globally */ -body, .slides { - font-family: 'Inter', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif !important; - color: var(--naif-body-color); - background-color: var(--naif-body-bg); -} - -h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { - font-family: 'Inter', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif !important; -} - -/* Header styling with NAIF colors */ -#main_title { - background: linear-gradient(135deg, var(--naif-strong-highlight), #8a9460) !important; - color: var(--naif-body-color) !important; -} - -#main_title h1 { - color: var(--naif-body-color) !important; -} - -/* Section headers with NAIF green */ -.level2 > h2:not(.theme-minimalist) { - background: linear-gradient(90deg, var(--naif-strong-highlight), var(--naif-light-highlight)) !important; - color: var(--naif-body-color) !important; - border-left: 4px solid var(--naif-strong-highlight); -} - -/* Links */ -a { - color: var(--naif-strong-highlight); -} - -a:hover { - color: #8a9460; -} - -/* Tables */ -table { - border-collapse: collapse; - width: 100%; -} - -th { - background-color: var(--naif-strong-highlight); - color: var(--naif-body-color); -} - -td, th { - border: 1px solid var(--naif-light-highlight); - padding: 0.4em 0.6em; -} - -tr:nth-child(even) { - background-color: var(--naif-light-highlight); -} - -/* Presenter highlight */ -.presenter { - font-weight: 600; - text-decoration: underline; - text-decoration-color: var(--naif-strong-highlight); -} - -/* Affiliations styling */ -.affiliations { - font-size: 0.85em; - color: #555; -} - -/* Footer/logo section */ -.level2:last-child img { - max-width: 100%; - height: auto; -} - - - diff --git a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.pdf b/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.pdf deleted file mode 100644 index 7657d15..0000000 Binary files a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.pdf and /dev/null differ diff --git a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.pdf.png b/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.pdf.png deleted file mode 100644 index 6c07119..0000000 Binary files a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.pdf.png and /dev/null differ diff --git a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.qmd b/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.qmd deleted file mode 100644 index 6eaa462..0000000 --- a/posters/2026-05-19-NAIF-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-at-Swiss-Higher-Education-Institutions/poster.qmd +++ /dev/null @@ -1,96 +0,0 @@ ---- -title: "NAIF: Responsible research assessment and metadata quality at Swiss higher education institutions" -lang: en-UK -image: poster.pdf.png -image-alt: "Poster preview for NAIF responsible research assessment and metadata quality at Swiss higher education institutions" -author: - - name: "Dr Moritz Mähr" - affiliations: - - ETH Zurich, Research Analytics Services, Zurich, Switzerland - - Digital Humanities, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland -format: - docposter-html: - fill-page: true - embed-resources: true - css: custom.css -draft: true ---- - -# {.col-2 style="grid-row: span 4;"} -## Overview -The **NAIF** project (National Approach for Interoperable Repositories and Findable Research Results) is a swissuniversities-funded collaboration led by ETH Library with seven Swiss higher education partners. - -This poster combines **Track 1** on responsible research assessment and **Track 4** on academic metadata quality. Its core message is direct: **responsible indicators and interoperable repositories require the same curated metadata foundation**. - -## Evidence base -### Track 1: Responsible assessment -* Workshop with **27 stakeholders** from Swiss higher education institutions, policy bodies, and the wider scientometrics community. -* Discussion of current indicator use, implementation barriers, and institutional needs. -* Framed by **DORA**, **CoARA**, and the **Leiden Manifesto**. - -### Track 4: Metadata quality -* Workshops with repository managers, data stewards, and open science specialists from across Switzerland. -* Focus on organisational, researcher, funding, and open access metadata. -* Prioritisation of practical actions for curation, workflows, and cross-institution coordination. - -## Key messages -| Aspect | Insight | -|--------|---------| -| Reform momentum | Swiss institutions increasingly align with DORA and CoARA, but implementation remains uneven. | -| Responsible indicators | Quantitative indicators must be transparent, contextual, and fair. | -| Preferred use | Organisational monitoring is generally more appropriate than individual benchmarking. | -| Metadata priorities | ROR and ORCID alignment, funding metadata, and open access metadata are the most actionable improvement areas. | - -## Acknowledgements {.theme-minimalist} -We thank the NAIF partner institutions and all workshop participants from Tracks 1 and 4 for their expertise and collaboration. - -### Contact {.fullwidth} -**NAIF Tracks 1 and 4** Responsible research assessment and academic metadata -eth-library.github.io/naif - -### Partner Institutions -

-![](../../images/logos/all-logos.jpg){style="width:100%;"} -

- -# {.col-2 style="grid-row: span 4;"} -## Q1: Why connect assessment and metadata? -* Repositories increasingly support **discovery**, **open science monitoring**, **policy reporting**, and sometimes **evaluation**. -* Incomplete or inconsistent records reduce findability and weaken interpretation. -* Metadata quality is therefore not only a technical issue; it is a precondition for **responsible research assessment**. - -## Q2: Which metadata families matter most? -| Metadata family | Why it matters | -|---|---| -| Organisational metadata | Disambiguates institutions and units, supports aggregation, and improves cross-system linking. | -| Researcher metadata | Connects outputs reliably to people and reduces ambiguity in authorship data. | -| Funding metadata | Links outputs to grants and programmes, making public investment more visible and interpretable. | -| Open access metadata | Clarifies dissemination routes, access conditions, and monitoring categories. | - -These four families provide the **contextual backbone** for repositories, discovery services, and assessment workflows. - -## Q3: What did Swiss stakeholders emphasise? -* Indicators must be **transparent**, **context-specific**, and **fair**. -* Quantitative metrics should **complement expert judgement**, not replace it. -* **Organisational monitoring** is generally preferable to individual performance ranking. -* **Data quality is non-negotiable**: source transparency, documentation, and curation are prerequisites for meaningful indicators. -* Academic libraries are central because they maintain trusted metadata and document its limits. - -## Q4: What can academic libraries do now? -* Improve institutional name disambiguation and **ROR** alignment. -* Strengthen **ORCID** integration in repository and CRIS workflows. -* Standardise the capture of **funding** and **open access** metadata at deposit stage. -* Maintain shared mappings for organisational hierarchies and local structures. -* Connect metadata curation more closely with local assessment and reporting needs. - -## Conclusion and key takeaways -NAIF will deliver practical guidance by the end of 2026. For libraries, the message is clear: **better metadata improve discovery and make evaluation more fair, transparent, and interpretable**. - -::: {style="font-size: 0.95em;"} -| | Takeaway | -|---|----------| -| 1 | Libraries curate infrastructure for both visibility and assessment. | -| 2 | Responsible indicators depend on trustworthy metadata. | -| 3 | Organisational, researcher, funding, and open access metadata provide essential context. | -| 4 | Shared governance is needed to sustain metadata quality across institutions. | -::: diff --git a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/_quarto.yml b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/_quarto.yml index 3f47591..873d671 100644 --- a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/_quarto.yml +++ b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/_quarto.yml @@ -1,7 +1,12 @@ +# Setting up the default project metadata for `quarto use` +# per https://quarto.org/docs/extensions/project-types.html#project-type-extension + project: - title: "DARIAH poster" + title: "DARIAH Annual Event 2026 Poster" type: docposter post-render: + # Also convert the poster html output to pdf. + # Comment out this chrome_pdf.R step if only the html output is desired. - _extensions/bbucior/docposter/R/chrome_pdf.R format: diff --git a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/custom.css b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/custom.css index 93a0826..307a393 100644 --- a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/custom.css +++ b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/custom.css @@ -1,92 +1,390 @@ -/* Use this file to override styles in the drposter template. - * - * Improve poster maintainability by keeping the resources separate - * from the package, and user styles separated from the overall package. - */ +/* Local visual refinements for the NAIF docposter. */ + +@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700;800&display=swap'); -/* NAIF colours from base_colors.scss */ :root { - --naif-strong-highlight: #A1AB71; - --naif-light-highlight: #E8E1D0; - --naif-body-color: #181818; - --naif-body-bg: white; + --naif-green: #A1AB71; + --naif-green-dark: #66713A; + --naif-green-soft: #E6EBD3; + --naif-sand: #E8E1D0; + --naif-sand-soft: #F7F3EA; + --naif-ink: #181818; + --naif-muted: #53574A; + --naif-line: #D4CBB8; + --naif-white: #FFFFFF; + --header-color: var(--naif-green-dark); + --other-color-for-h2-gradient: var(--naif-green); + --block-padding: 1.05rem; + --h2-height: 3rem; + --inter-block-spacing: 0.9rem; } -/* Import Inter font from Google Fonts */ -@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&display=swap'); +html { + background: #ffffff; +} -/* Apply Inter font globally */ -body, .slides { +body, +.slides { + color: var(--naif-ink); font-family: 'Inter', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif !important; - color: var(--naif-body-color); - background-color: var(--naif-body-bg); } -h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { +.slides { + grid-column-gap: 1.25cm; +} + +h1, +h2, +h3, +h4, +h5, +h6 { + color: var(--naif-ink); font-family: 'Inter', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif !important; + letter-spacing: -0.02em; +} + +.slides > header { + background: #ffffff; + border-bottom: 0.12rem solid var(--naif-green-dark); + border-radius: 0; + color: var(--naif-ink); + margin-bottom: 0.35rem; + padding: 0 0 0.8rem; + text-align: left; +} + +.slides > header::after { + content: none; +} + +#main_title, +#main_title h1, +.slides > header h1 { + background: none !important; + color: var(--naif-ink) !important; +} + +.slides > header h1 { + font-size: 2.18rem; + font-weight: 800; + line-height: 1.05; + margin-top: 0.25rem; + max-width: 100%; +} + +.author, +.affiliations { + color: rgba(24, 24, 24, 0.82); + font-size: 0.8rem; + font-weight: 500; +} + +.presenter { + font-weight: 800; + text-decoration: underline; + text-decoration-color: var(--naif-green-dark); + text-decoration-thickness: 0.12em; + text-underline-offset: 0.18em; +} + +.level2 { + background: #ffffff; + border: 0.06rem solid var(--naif-line); + border-radius: 0; + margin-top: 1.8rem; +} + +.level2:not(.theme-minimalist) > h2 { + background: #ffffff !important; + border-bottom: 0.1rem solid var(--naif-green-dark); + border-left: 0; + border-radius: 0; + color: var(--naif-green-dark) !important; + font-size: 1.34rem; + font-weight: 750; + height: auto; + line-height: 1.25; + margin: 0 var(--flex-gutter); + min-height: 0; + padding: 0 0 0.35rem; + text-transform: none; +} + +.theme-minimalist.level2, +.level1 .theme-minimalist.level2 { + background: transparent; + border: 0; + margin-top: 0.9rem; + overflow: visible; } -/* Header styling with NAIF colours */ -#main_title { - background: linear-gradient(135deg, var(--naif-strong-highlight), #8a9460) !important; - color: var(--naif-body-color) !important; +.theme-minimalist.level2 > h2, +.level1 .theme-minimalist.level2 > h2 { + border-bottom: 0.13rem solid var(--naif-green); + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + font-size: 1.1rem; + font-weight: 750; + letter-spacing: 0.01em; } -#main_title h1 { - color: var(--naif-body-color) !important; +.theme-minimalist.level2 h3, +.level1 .theme-minimalist.level2 h3 { + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + font-size: 0.9rem; +} + +.level2 h3 { + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + font-size: 0.98rem; + font-weight: 750; + margin-bottom: 0.15rem; +} + +p, +li, +td, +th { + font-size: 0.82rem; + line-height: 1.38; } -/* Section headers with NAIF green */ -.level2 > h2:not(.theme-minimalist) { - background: linear-gradient(90deg, var(--naif-strong-highlight), var(--naif-light-highlight)) !important; - color: var(--naif-body-color) !important; - border-left: 4px solid var(--naif-strong-highlight); +strong { + font-weight: 750; } -/* Links */ a { - color: var(--naif-strong-highlight); + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + font-weight: 650; } a:hover { - color: #8a9460; + color: var(--naif-ink); +} + +.level2 ul { + padding-left: 1.05rem; +} + +ul li::before { + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + content: ""; + background: var(--naif-green); + border-radius: 999px; + display: inline-block; + height: 0.36em; + margin-bottom: 0.12em; + margin-left: calc(-1 * var(--bullet-spacing)); + margin-right: 0.35em; + width: 0.36em; +} + +.thesis { + background: var(--naif-sand-soft); + border-left: 0.22rem solid var(--naif-green-dark); + border-radius: 0; + color: var(--naif-ink); + flex: 100%; + font-size: 1.05rem; + font-weight: 760; + line-height: 1.25; + padding: 0.85rem 1rem; +} + +.evidence-grid, +.metadata-grid, +.takeaway-grid, +.flow-model { + display: grid; + flex: 100%; + gap: 0.62rem; + margin-left: var(--flex-gutter); + margin-right: var(--flex-gutter); + width: calc(100% - var(--block-padding)); +} + +.evidence-grid, +.metadata-grid { + grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr)); +} + +.takeaway-grid { + grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr)); +} + +.flow-model { + align-items: stretch; + grid-template-columns: 1fr auto 1.25fr auto 1fr; +} + +.flow-step { + align-items: center; + background: var(--naif-sand-soft); + border: 0.05rem solid var(--naif-line); + border-top: 0.16rem solid var(--naif-green-dark); + display: flex; + justify-content: center; + margin: 0; + min-height: 3.1rem; + padding: 0.45rem; + text-align: center; +} + +.flow-step p { + font-size: 0.74rem; + line-height: 1.18; + margin: 0; +} + +.flow-arrow { + align-items: center; + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + display: flex; + font-size: 1.05rem; + font-weight: 800; + justify-content: center; + margin: 0; +} + +.metadata-strip { + background: #ffffff; + border: 0.05rem solid rgba(102, 113, 58, 0.32); + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + flex: 100%; + font-size: 0.7rem; + font-weight: 730; + letter-spacing: 0.01em; + margin-left: var(--flex-gutter); + margin-right: var(--flex-gutter); + padding: 0.35rem 0.5rem; + text-align: center; + width: calc(100% - var(--block-padding)); +} + +.evidence-card, +.metadata-card, +.takeaway { + background: #ffffff; + border: 0.05rem solid var(--naif-line); + border-radius: 0; + box-sizing: border-box; + margin: 0; + padding: 0.54rem 0.64rem; +} + +.evidence-card > *, +.metadata-card > *, +.takeaway > *, +.flow-step > *, +.flow-arrow > * { + margin-left: 0; + margin-right: 0; +} + +.evidence-card > * + *, +.metadata-card > * + *, +.takeaway > * + * { + margin-top: 0.35rem; +} + +.evidence-card { + background: #ffffff; +} + +.evidence-card h3, +.metadata-card h3 { + margin-top: 0; +} + +.evidence-card ul { + margin-top: 0.35rem; +} + +.metadata-card { + border-left: 0.16rem solid var(--naif-green); +} + +.metadata-card p, +.takeaway p { + font-size: 0.74rem; + line-height: 1.28; +} + +.takeaway { + background: #ffffff; + border-color: rgba(102, 113, 58, 0.30); +} + +.takeaway strong { + background: var(--naif-green-dark); + border-radius: 999px; + color: var(--naif-white); + display: inline-block; + font-size: 0.72rem; + height: 1.25rem; + line-height: 1.25rem; + margin-right: 0.25rem; + text-align: center; + width: 1.25rem; } -/* Tables */ table { - border-collapse: collapse; + border-collapse: separate; + border-spacing: 0; + overflow: hidden; width: 100%; } th { - background-color: var(--naif-strong-highlight); - color: var(--naif-body-color); + background: var(--naif-green-dark); + color: var(--naif-white); + font-weight: 750; } -td, th { - border: 1px solid var(--naif-light-highlight); - padding: 0.4em 0.6em; +td, +th { + border: 0; + border-bottom: 0.04rem solid var(--naif-line); + padding: 0.36em 0.5em; + vertical-align: top; } -tr:nth-child(even) { - background-color: var(--naif-light-highlight); +td:first-child, +th:first-child { + font-weight: 720; + width: 31%; } -/* Presenter highlight */ -.presenter { - font-weight: 600; - text-decoration: underline; - text-decoration-color: var(--naif-strong-highlight); +tr:nth-child(even) td { + background-color: var(--naif-sand-soft); } -/* Affiliations styling */ -.affiliations { - font-size: 0.85em; - color: #555; +tr:nth-child(odd) td { + background-color: #ffffff; } -/* Footer/logo section */ -.level2:last-child img { - max-width: 100%; +.level2:last-child img, +img[src*="all-logos"] { + background: #ffffff; + border-radius: 0.5rem; + box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; + max-width: 100%; + padding: 0.35rem; +} + +.theme-minimalist a { + color: var(--naif-green-dark); + text-decoration-thickness: 0.08em; +} + +@media print { + .slides > header, + .level2, + .thesis, + .evidence-card, + .metadata-card, + .takeaway { + break-inside: avoid; + } } diff --git a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.html b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..706fbeb --- /dev/null +++ b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.html @@ -0,0 +1,1049 @@ + + + + + + + + + + +NAIF: Responsible Research Assessment and Metadata Quality for Interoperable Research Infrastructures in Switzerland + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + +
+

NAIF: Responsible Research Assessment and Metadata Quality for Interoperable Research Infrastructures in Switzerland

+ +Dr Moritz Mähr1,2 +
    +
  1. ETH Zurich, Research Analytics Services, Zurich, Switzerland
    2. +
  2. Digital Humanities, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    3. +
+ + + + + +
+ + +
+

+
+

Overview

+

NAIF (National Approach for Interoperable Repositories and Findable Research Results) is a swissuniversities co-funded collaboration between eight Swiss higher education institutions that strengthens interoperability and metadata quality across Swiss institutional repositories.

+
+

Responsible indicators and interoperable repositories require the same curated metadata foundation.

+
+

Fragmented repository practices make national discovery, monitoring, and analysis difficult. This poster connects Track 1 on responsible research assessment with Track 4 on academic metadata quality to show why assessment reform and repository interoperability should be treated as one shared infrastructure problem.

+
+
+

Shared infrastructure model

+
+
+

Repository metadata

+
+
+

→

+
+
+

Discovery, monitoring, reporting

+
+
+

→

+
+
+

Responsible indicators

+
+
+
+

Organisations | Researchers | Funding | Open Access

+
+
+
+

Evidence base

+
+
+

Track 1: Responsible assessment

+
    +
  • Workshop with 27 stakeholders from Swiss higher education institutions, policy bodies, and the wider scientometrics community.
    • +
  • Discussion of current indicator use, implementation barriers, and institutional needs.
    • +
  • Framed by DORA, CoARA, and the Leiden Manifesto.
    • +
+
+
+

Track 4: Metadata quality

+
    +
  • Workshops with repository managers, data stewards, and open science specialists from across Switzerland.
    • +
  • Focus on organisational, researcher, funding, and Open Access metadata.
    • +
  • Prioritisation of practical actions for curation, workflows, and cross-institution coordination.
    • +
+
+
+
+
+

Key messages

+ ++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
AspectInsight
Reform momentumSwiss institutions increasingly align with DORA and CoARA, but implementation remains uneven.
Responsible indicatorsQuantitative indicators must be transparent, contextual, and fair.
Preferred useOrganisational monitoring is generally more appropriate than individual benchmarking.
Metadata prioritiesROR and ORCID alignment, funding metadata, and Open Access metadata are the most actionable improvement areas.
+
+
+

Next steps

+

Qualitative survey with research assessment and repository actors to map practices, expectations, and tensions around indicator use and metadata workflows.

+

By the end of 2026, NAIF will deliver practical guidance and governance proposals for Swiss repository interoperability.

+
+

Contact

+

NAIF Tracks 1 and 4
+Responsible research assessment and academic metadata
+naif@library.ethz.ch | https://eth-library.github.io/naif/

+
+
+

Consortium and funder

+

+ +

+
+
+
+
+

+
+

Q1: Why connect assessment and metadata?

+
    +
  • Repositories increasingly support discovery, open science monitoring, policy reporting, and evaluation practices.
    • +
  • Incomplete or inconsistent records reduce findability and weaken interpretation.
    • +
  • Metadata quality is therefore not only a technical issue; it is a precondition for responsible research assessment.
    • +
+
+
+

Q2: Which metadata families matter most?

+
+
+

Organisations

+

Disambiguate institutions and units, support aggregation, and improve cross-system linking.

+
+
+

Researchers

+

Connect outputs reliably to people and reduce ambiguity in authorship data.

+
+
+

Funding

+

Link outputs to grants and programmes, making public investment more visible and interpretable.

+
+
+

Open Access

+

Clarify dissemination routes, access conditions, and monitoring categories.

+
+
+

These four families provide the contextual backbone for repositories, discovery services, and assessment workflows.

+
+
+

Q3: What did Swiss stakeholders emphasise?

+
    +
  • Indicators must be transparent, context-specific, and fair.
    • +
  • Quantitative metrics should complement expert judgement, not replace it.
    • +
  • Organisational monitoring is generally preferable to individual performance ranking.
    • +
  • Data quality is non-negotiable: source transparency, documentation, and curation are prerequisites for meaningful indicators.
    • +
  • Academic libraries are central because they maintain trusted metadata and document its limits.
    • +
+
+
+

Q4: What can academic libraries do now?

+
    +
  • Improve institutional name disambiguation and ROR alignment.
    • +
  • Strengthen ORCID integration in repository and CRIS workflows.
    • +
  • Standardise the capture of funding and Open Access metadata at deposit stage.
    • +
  • Maintain shared mappings for organisational hierarchies and local structures.
    • +
  • Connect metadata curation more closely with local assessment and reporting needs.
    • +
+
+
+

Conclusion and key takeaways

+

NAIF treats metadata stewardship and responsible indicators as one shared infrastructure challenge. Better organisational, researcher, funding, and Open Access metadata improve discovery, support transparent monitoring, and make evaluation more fair, transparent, and interpretable.

+
+
+

1 Libraries curate infrastructure for both visibility and assessment.

+
+
+

2 Responsible indicators depend on trustworthy metadata.

+
+
+

3 Four metadata families provide essential context.

+
+
+

4 Shared governance through a national working group can sustain quality beyond the project period.

+
+
+
+
+ +
+ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf index 58d0c31..452bf4d 100644 Binary files a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf and b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf differ diff --git a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf.png b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf.png index 7c023d8..3ec7917 100644 Binary files a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf.png and b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.pdf.png differ diff --git a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.qmd b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.qmd index f149b2f..bc2278a 100644 --- a/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.qmd +++ b/posters/2026-05-26-Responsible-Research-Assessment-and-Metadata-Quality-for-Interoperable-Research-Infrastructures-in-Switzerland/poster.qmd @@ -1,102 +1,156 @@ --- -title: "Responsible Research Assessment and Metadata Quality for Interoperable Research Infrastructures in Switzerland" +title: "NAIF: Responsible Research Assessment and Metadata Quality for Interoperable Research Infrastructures in Switzerland" +lang: en-UK image: poster.pdf.png -image-alt: "Poster preview for responsible research assessment and metadata quality for interoperable research infrastructures in Switzerland" +image-alt: "Poster preview for NAIF Responsible Research Assessment and Metadata Quality for Interoperable Research Infrastructures in Switzerland" author: - name: "Dr Moritz Mähr" affiliations: - - ETH Library, ETH Zurich, Switzerland + - ETH Zurich, Research Analytics Services, Zurich, Switzerland + - Digital Humanities, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland format: docposter-html: fill-page: true embed-resources: true css: custom.css -draft: true +draft: false --- # {.col-2 style="grid-row: span 4;"} ## Overview -The **NAIF** project (National Approach for Interoperable Repositories and Findable Research Results) is a swissuniversities-funded collaboration between eight Swiss higher education institutions. +**NAIF** (National Approach for Interoperable Repositories and Findable Research Results) is a swissuniversities co-funded collaboration between eight Swiss higher education institutions that strengthens interoperability and metadata quality across Swiss institutional repositories. -This poster links **Track 1** on responsible indicators and **Track 4** on metadata enrichment. +::: {.thesis} +Responsible indicators and interoperable repositories require the same curated metadata foundation. +::: -**Core claim:** repository interoperability and responsible research assessment rely on the same metadata infrastructure. +Fragmented repository practices make national discovery, monitoring, and analysis difficult. This poster connects **Track 1** on responsible research assessment with **Track 4** on academic metadata quality to show why assessment reform and repository interoperability should be treated as one shared infrastructure problem. -## Why this matters -| Repositories now support | What this requires | -|---|---| -| Discovery and reuse | Metadata that travel well across systems | -| Open science services | Structured and interoperable records | -| Monitoring and evaluation | Transparent, documented, contextual data | +## Shared infrastructure model +::: {.flow-model} +::: {.flow-step} +**Repository metadata** +::: +::: {.flow-arrow} +→ +::: +::: {.flow-step} +**Discovery, monitoring, reporting** +::: +::: {.flow-arrow} +→ +::: +::: {.flow-step} +**Responsible indicators** +::: +::: -Poor metadata weaken **findability**, **interoperability**, and **indicator interpretation** at the same time. +::: {.metadata-strip} +**Organisations** | **Researchers** | **Funding** | **Open Access** +::: ## Evidence base -| Track | Current work | Main output | -|---|---|---| -| Track 1 | Workshop with **27 stakeholders** and a planned qualitative survey | Guidance for DORA- and CoARA-aligned indicator use | -| Track 4 | National workshops on metadata priorities | Mappings, reference data, and implementation guidance | +::: {.evidence-grid} +::: {.evidence-card} +### Track 1: Responsible assessment +* Workshop with **27 stakeholders** from Swiss higher education institutions, policy bodies, and the wider scientometrics community. +* Discussion of current indicator use, implementation barriers, and institutional needs. +* Framed by **DORA**, **CoARA**, and the **Leiden Manifesto**. +::: + +::: {.evidence-card} +### Track 4: Metadata quality +* Workshops with repository managers, data stewards, and open science specialists from across Switzerland. +* Focus on organisational, researcher, funding, and Open Access metadata. +* Prioritisation of practical actions for curation, workflows, and cross-institution coordination. +::: +::: -## DARIAH alignment {.theme-minimalist} -| DARIAH theme | NAIF contribution | -|---|---| -| Infrastructures of engagement | Repositories are collaborative infrastructures whose metadata shape access and visibility. | -| Mapping engagement | Trustworthy indicators need reusable metadata and documented methods. | -| Policy and governance frameworks | DORA, CoARA, and shared stewardship help turn principles into practice. | +## Key messages +| Aspect | Insight | +|--------|---------| +| Reform momentum | Swiss institutions increasingly align with DORA and CoARA, but implementation remains uneven. | +| Responsible indicators | Quantitative indicators must be transparent, contextual, and fair. | +| Preferred use | Organisational monitoring is generally more appropriate than individual benchmarking. | +| Metadata priorities | ROR and ORCID alignment, funding metadata, and Open Access metadata are the most actionable improvement areas. | -## Acknowledgments {.theme-minimalist} -We thank the NAIF partner institutions, workshop participants from Tracks 1 and 4, and the wider Swiss repository and scientometrics communities for their contributions. +## Next steps {.theme-minimalist} +Qualitative survey with research assessment and repository actors to map practices, expectations, and tensions around indicator use and metadata workflows. + +By the end of 2026, NAIF will deliver practical guidance and governance proposals for Swiss repository interoperability. ### Contact {.fullwidth} -**NAIF Tracks 1 and 4** Responsible research assessment and academic metadata -eth-library.github.io/naif +**NAIF Tracks 1 and 4** +Responsible research assessment and academic metadata +[naif@library.ethz.ch](mailto:naif@library.ethz.ch) | -### Partner Institutions +### Consortium and funder

![](../../images/logos/all-logos.jpg){style="width:100%;"}

# {.col-2 style="grid-row: span 4;"} -## Q1: Why link assessment and metadata? -* Repository metadata now support **evaluation**, **monitoring**, and **policy reporting** as well as discovery. -* Assessment without metadata work risks **misleading indicators**. -* Metadata work without clear use cases risks **underused infrastructure**. - -**Responsible metrics begin with responsible metadata stewardship.** - -## Q2: Which metadata families create context? -| Metadata family | Why it matters across infrastructures | -|---|---| -| Organisational identifiers | Reliable institution and unit aggregation | -| Researcher identifiers | Cleaner authorship links across systems | -| Funding information | Clear links between outputs and grants | -| Open access status and publication pathways | Interpretable monitoring of dissemination routes | - -Together these four families provide the **context** needed to interpret outputs reliably across repositories, national services, and international infrastructures. - -## Q3: What are the emerging lessons? -| Signal | Current lesson | -|---|---| -| Adoption | **24** Swiss institutions have signed DORA; **16** are CoARA signatories | -| Practice | Principles remain hard to operationalise in daily workflows | -| Use | Prioritise **organisational monitoring** over individual benchmarking | -| Quality | Transparent sources and documented methods are essential | -| Action | ROR, ORCID, funding, and open access metadata are current priorities | - -## Q4: What happens next? -* Map institutional practices, expectations, and tensions through a **qualitative survey**. -* Turn workshop priorities into **practical guidance**, mappings, and curated reference data. -* Build stronger feedback loops between repository teams, assessment experts, and policy actors. -* Feed the results into a **national working-group model** for longer-term coordination. +## Q1: Why connect assessment and metadata? +* Repositories increasingly support **discovery**, **open science monitoring**, **policy reporting**, and **evaluation practices**. +* Incomplete or inconsistent records reduce findability and weaken interpretation. +* Metadata quality is therefore not only a technical issue; it is a precondition for **responsible research assessment**. + +## Q2: Which metadata families matter most? +::: {.metadata-grid} +::: {.metadata-card} +### Organisations +Disambiguate institutions and units, support aggregation, and improve cross-system linking. +::: + +::: {.metadata-card} +### Researchers +Connect outputs reliably to people and reduce ambiguity in authorship data. +::: + +::: {.metadata-card} +### Funding +Link outputs to grants and programmes, making public investment more visible and interpretable. +::: + +::: {.metadata-card} +### Open Access +Clarify dissemination routes, access conditions, and monitoring categories. +::: +::: + +These four families provide the **contextual backbone** for repositories, discovery services, and assessment workflows. + +## Q3: What did Swiss stakeholders emphasise? +* Indicators must be **transparent**, **context-specific**, and **fair**. +* Quantitative metrics should **complement expert judgement**, not replace it. +* **Organisational monitoring** is generally preferable to individual performance ranking. +* **Data quality is non-negotiable**: source transparency, documentation, and curation are prerequisites for meaningful indicators. +* Academic libraries are central because they maintain trusted metadata and document its limits. + +## Q4: What can academic libraries do now? +* Improve institutional name disambiguation and **ROR** alignment. +* Strengthen **ORCID** integration in repository and CRIS workflows. +* Standardise the capture of **funding** and **Open Access** metadata at deposit stage. +* Maintain shared mappings for organisational hierarchies and local structures. +* Connect metadata curation more closely with local assessment and reporting needs. ## Conclusion and key takeaways -**Evaluation practices and repository infrastructures should not be treated as separate domains.** They are parts of the same sociotechnical infrastructure for trustworthy knowledge production, equitable research evaluation, and long-term visibility. - -::: {style="font-size: 0.95em;"} -| | Takeaway | -|---|---| -| 1 | Responsible indicators depend on reusable and trustworthy metadata. | -| 2 | Repository interoperability and research assessment must be designed together. | -| 3 | Identifiers, funding links, and open access metadata provide essential interpretive context. | -| 4 | Shared governance is required to sustain metadata quality across infrastructures. | +NAIF treats metadata stewardship and responsible indicators as one shared infrastructure challenge. Better organisational, researcher, funding, and Open Access metadata improve discovery, support transparent monitoring, and make evaluation more fair, transparent, and interpretable. + +::: {.takeaway-grid} +::: {.takeaway} +**1** Libraries curate infrastructure for both visibility and assessment. +::: + +::: {.takeaway} +**2** Responsible indicators depend on trustworthy metadata. +::: + +::: {.takeaway} +**3** Four metadata families provide essential context. +::: + +::: {.takeaway} +**4** Shared governance through a national working group can sustain quality beyond the project period. +::: :::