Call for Input: Best place to host "Call for Input" #397
Description
Call for Input
| Decision |
Should we move "Call for Input" to ethereum/pm GitHub for better visibility and engagement? |
|---|---|
| If Affirmed |
Move future Call for Input to Ethereum pm GitHub. |
| If Rejected |
Continue using EIPIP GitHub for "Call for Input". |
| Method |
Rough Consensus |
| Deadline |
Feb 4, 2026 |
Background
The Ethereum PM repository is the central place to find information about Ethereum meetings, making it a popular go-to resource for the community. In contrast, the EIPIP GitHub repository has low discoverability. While input is invited from EIP editors, issuing a Call for Input via the Ethereum PM repository would better attract community feedback and help surface broader public sentiment.
Checklist
I, the opener of this Call for Input, have completed the following:
- Filled in a descriptive title.
- Filled in the "Decision" field.
- Filled in the "If Affirmed" field.
- Filled in the "If Rejected" field.
- Filled in the "Method" field.
- Filled in the "Deadline" field to be thirty days from creation.
- Added any relevant background information (or removed the section.)
- Published a notice in writing to the usual channels frequented by EIP Editors (likely Discord.)
- Commented on this Call for Input, clearly stating my opinion (or abstention.)