Add ERC: Non-Fungible Multi-Token ownerOf #12915
Annotations
7 errors and 1 warning
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93
validation found errors :(
|
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93:
ERCS/erc-8276.md#L76
error[markdown-link-first]: the first match of the given pattern must be a link
--> ERCS/erc-8276.md
|
76 | Existing ERC-5409-style ERC-1155 contracts can be compatible if they satisfy this ERC's invariants and support `0x6352211e` through ...
|
= info: the pattern in question: `(?i)(?:eip|erc)-([0-9])+`
|
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93:
ERCS/erc-8276.md#L70
error[markdown-link-first]: the first match of the given pattern must be a link
--> ERCS/erc-8276.md
|
70 | ERC-1155 and ERC-6909 are included in one ERC because the ownership accessor, selector, ERC-165 identifier, balance invariant, and i...
|
= info: the pattern in question: `(?i)(?:eip|erc)-([0-9])+`
|
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93:
ERCS/erc-8276.md#L66
error[markdown-link-first]: the first match of the given pattern must be a link
--> ERCS/erc-8276.md
|
66 | The interface is deliberately one function. ERC-721 `ownerOf(uint256)` is already the common single-owner read used by NFT tooling, ...
|
= info: the pattern in question: `(?i)(?:eip|erc)-([0-9])+`
|
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93:
ERCS/erc-8276.md#L50
error[markdown-link-first]: the first match of the given pattern must be a link
--> ERCS/erc-8276.md
|
50 | - MUST implement ERC-165 and return `true` for interface identifier `0x6352211e`.
|
= info: the pattern in question: `(?i)(?:eip|erc)-([0-9])+`
|
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93:
ERCS/erc-8276.md#L46
error[markdown-link-first]: the first match of the given pattern must be a link
--> ERCS/erc-8276.md
|
46 | The ERC-165 interface identifier for `IERC_NFMultiTokenOwnerOf` is `0x6352211e`, calculated as `bytes4(keccak256("ownerOf(uint256)")...
|
= info: the pattern in question: `(?i)(?:eip|erc)-([0-9])+`
|
|
Run ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93:
ERCS/erc-8276.md#L26
error[markdown-link-first]: the first match of the given pattern must be a link
--> ERCS/erc-8276.md
|
26 | This ERC generalizes the Stagnant [ERC-5409](./eip-5409.md) proposal for ERC-1155 by retaining the same `ownerOf(uint256)` selector ...
|
= info: the pattern in question: `(?i)(?:eip|erc)-([0-9])+`
= help: see https://ethereum.github.io/eipw/markdown-link-first/
|
|
Complete job
Node.js 20 actions are deprecated. The following actions are running on Node.js 20 and may not work as expected: actions/checkout@47fbe2df0ad0e27efb67a70beac3555f192b062f, ethereum/eipw-action@be3fa642ec311d0b8e1fdb811e5c9b4ada3d3d93. Actions will be forced to run with Node.js 24 by default starting June 2nd, 2026. Node.js 20 will be removed from the runner on September 16th, 2026. Please check if updated versions of these actions are available that support Node.js 24. To opt into Node.js 24 now, set the FORCE_JAVASCRIPT_ACTIONS_TO_NODE24=true environment variable on the runner or in your workflow file. Once Node.js 24 becomes the default, you can temporarily opt out by setting ACTIONS_ALLOW_USE_UNSECURE_NODE_VERSION=true. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2025-09-19-deprecation-of-node-20-on-github-actions-runners/
|
background
wait
wait-all
cancel
parallel
Loading