Inconsistent formatting of notes in function documentation

[Carlosssr]

The ERC20 specification documentation uses inconsistent formatting for notes across different function descriptions:

transfer() and transferFrom(): Uses "Note" (capitalized, no colon)
approve(): Uses "NOTE:" (all caps with colon)

Current Examples
transfer() and transferFrom():
Note Transfers of 0 values MUST be treated as normal transfers and fire the Transfer event.
approve():
NOTE: To prevent attack vectors like the one described here...
Proposed Solution
Standardize the note formatting across all functions.

Suggested format:
Option 1: Use "Note:" (bold with colon)
Note: Transfers of 0 values MUST be treated as normal transfers...
Option 2: Use "NOTE:" (all caps with colon) consistently
NOTE: Transfers of 0 values MUST be treated as normal transfers...
Impact

Improves documentation consistency
Enhances readability
Maintains professional documentation standards
Better developer experience