Choose a license

[samajammin]

While this repo is public, we haven't added a license. See info here:
https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/licensing-a-repository

One consideration: do we want different licenses for code vs. content? e.g. we could make the code MIT but maintain copyright on the blog posts (or make the content CC).

[dankrad]

I would be happy to have it all open (CC or MIT). I guess for the blog posts it should be up to the authors, but CC with attribution feels fair.

[samajammin]

FWIW I think that's a solid path forward & would match with ethereum.org.

On ethereum.org you can see the repo has an MIT license for the code:
https://github.com/ethereum/ethereum-org-website/blob/dev/LICENSE

And within the terms page we specify that all content is CC (see "Intellectual Property Rights" section):
https://ethereum.org/en/terms-of-use/

Unless otherwise marked, (a) all material, data, and information on the Websites, such as data files, text, music, audio files or other sounds, photographs, videos, or other images, but excluding any software or computer code (collectively, the “Non-Code Content”) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; and (b) all software or computer code (collectively, the “Code Content”) are licensed under the MIT License.