| title | Pattern: ICMA Bond Data Taxonomy (canonical terms/events) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| status | ready | ||||||||
| maturity | production | ||||||||
| layer | offchain | ||||||||
| privacy_goal | Standardize bond data for clean attestations without exposing raw data | ||||||||
| assumptions | ICMA BDT schema adoption, schema validator tooling, registrar integration | ||||||||
| last_reviewed | 2026-01-14 | ||||||||
| works-best-when |
|
||||||||
| avoid-when |
|
||||||||
| dependencies |
|
||||||||
| context | i2i | ||||||||
| crops_profile |
|
Use ICMA Bond Data Taxonomy as the canonical schema for bond terms & lifecycle events to avoid fragmentation and enable clean attestations/proofs.
- Standards: ICMA BDT
- Infra: Schema loader/validator; compression (XML→binary)
- Off-chain: Mapping to registrar records; EAS hash anchoring
- Author terms/events in BDT.
- Validate; compress; store (on/off-chain hash).
- Use same schema in proofs/disclosures.
- Interop-ready, regulator-friendly data.
- Easier proofs/attestations.
- Up-front mapping effort to existing systems.
- CROPS context (i2i): CR could reach
mediumif the BDT schema is published as a permissionless open registry with EAS-anchored contributions and no approval gate. Among institutional counterparties, open schema governance ensures no single issuer or registrar controls the canonical bond data format, enabling competitive issuance platforms to interoperate without gatekeeping.
- Issuance terms in BDT; hash anchored via EAS; regulator verifies consistency.
- pattern-crypto-registry-bridge-ewpg-eas.md