Skip to content

Issues: ethereum/solidity

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
11 Open 42 Closed
11 Open 42 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Graceful handling of non-ICE exceptions annoys users 😢 medium effort Default level of effort medium impact Default level of impact must have Something we consider an essential part of Solidity 1.0.
#15139 opened May 23, 2024 by cameel
1
@inheritdoc tag in Natspec does not stop at the end of the line annoys users 😢 bug 🐛 low effort There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny. low impact Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited. must have eventually Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#14397 opened Jul 10, 2023 by CJ42
2
Replace --ir output with --ir-optimized annoys users 😢 breaking change ⚠️ low effort There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny. low impact Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited. must have eventually Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#14364 opened Jun 26, 2023 by cameel
1
Function type conversion mistake? annoys users 😢 documentation 📖 low effort There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny. must have eventually Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#13942 opened Feb 6, 2023 by emamoah
4
Inlining heuristics for FunctionSpecializer annoys users 😢 high impact Changes are very prominent and affect users or the project in a major way. must have Something we consider an essential part of Solidity 1.0. optimizer
#13787 opened Dec 7, 2022 by hrkrshnn
4
Stop the war on for loops annoys users 😢 must have eventually Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it. optimizer
#13308 opened Jul 27, 2022 by fulldecent
7
Overhaul Inheritance and Override Logic annoys users 😢 high effort A lot to implement but still doable by a single person. The task is large or difficult. high impact Changes are very prominent and affect users or the project in a major way. language design :rage4: Any changes to the language, e.g. new features must have Something we consider an essential part of Solidity 1.0.
#12665 opened Feb 14, 2022 by ekpyron
2 tasks
4
Better "stack too deep" errors annoys users 😢 medium effort Default level of effort medium impact Default level of impact must have eventually Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it. needs design The proposal is too vague to be implemented right away
#12449 opened Dec 22, 2021 by 134dd3v
8
Array literals should be convertible to both dynamically-sized and statically-sized arrays annoys users 😢 high effort A lot to implement but still doable by a single person. The task is large or difficult. high impact Changes are very prominent and affect users or the project in a major way. language design :rage4: Any changes to the language, e.g. new features selected for development It's on our short-term development
#11879 opened Sep 1, 2021 by chriseth
1
@wechman
27
Overload resolution failure should explain for each candidate why it does not match. annoys users 😢 medium effort Default level of effort medium impact Default level of impact must have eventually Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#9607 opened Aug 12, 2020 by Marenz
10
Arbitrary order of contracts in override specifier is confusing. annoys users 😢 breaking change ⚠️ low effort There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny. low impact Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited. must have eventually Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it. needs design The proposal is too vague to be implemented right away
#8354 opened Feb 20, 2020 by apguerrera
18
ProTip! Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.