-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
Issues: ethereum/solidity
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
EthDebug Format Output (Source Maps Equivalent)
ethdebug
feature
selected for development
It's on our short-term development
#15884
opened Feb 21, 2025 by
veniger
Mask generation optimization
feature
nice to have
We don’t see a good reason not to have it but won’t go out of our way to implement it.
optimizer
#15870
opened Feb 16, 2025 by
moh-eulith
[optimisation] quick win - byte size optimised address mask
feature
#15762
opened Jan 23, 2025 by
radeksvarz
Optimize Issues waiting for more input by the reporter
type(uint256).max
into PUSH0 NOT
feature
optimizer
waiting for more input
#15761
opened Jan 23, 2025 by
radeksvarz
Support for arbitrary contract storage base location
feature
high impact
Changes are very prominent and affect users or the project in a major way.
medium effort
Default level of effort
selected for development
It's on our short-term development
#15727
opened Jan 17, 2025 by
matheusaaguiar
How about adding Erwin, a random Solidity program generator, into CI/CD workflow?
feature
#15680
opened Dec 27, 2024 by
haoyang9804
Do not set freemem pointer when having only fallback function with sole assembly block
feature
#15627
opened Dec 9, 2024 by
radeksvarz
Add Support for Compiling and Deploying First Class Functions
feature
#15621
opened Dec 6, 2024 by
cre-mer
Rename the Solidity contract metadata.json to Blueprint
feature
#15614
opened Dec 5, 2024 by
kuzdogan
User defined value type with operators and/or forward references or aliases for types in libraries
feature
#15324
opened Aug 10, 2024 by
aathan
Generic way to access the underlying type of an UDVT
feature
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
low impact
Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited.
should have
We like the idea but it’s not important enough to be a part of the roadmap.
#15318
opened Aug 8, 2024 by
aathan
Signed int256 addition optimization
feature
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
medium impact
Default level of impact
selected for development
It's on our short-term development
#15283
opened Jul 19, 2024 by
Czar102
Support "calldata" as an overloaded location for reference variables.
feature
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#15000
opened Apr 8, 2024 by
Amxx
Resuming compilation from AST import does not produce identical metadata
feature
high effort
A lot to implement but still doable by a single person. The task is large or difficult.
medium impact
Default level of impact
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#14986
opened Apr 4, 2024 by
Subway2023
Version the There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
medium impact
Default level of impact
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
solcbin
list.json
file for build information
feature
low effort
#14955
opened Mar 19, 2024 by
sambacha
Allow modularising yul assembly
feature
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#14855
opened Feb 15, 2024 by
zemse
Outputting the CBOR Metadata positions in the bytecode
feature
high impact
Changes are very prominent and affect users or the project in a major way.
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
must have
Something we consider an essential part of Solidity 1.0.
#14827
opened Jan 31, 2024 by
kuzdogan
Selective function inlining and optimisation
feature
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#14789
opened Jan 19, 2024 by
PetarMax
Previous Next
ProTip!
Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.