Open
Description
It might just be my opinion, but if it's possible, I think this "child" gem should have the same license as its parent (which, to the best of my understanding, is dual licensed with GPL and the Ruby license).
Since this requires consent from all authors, I'll tag all authors here in the hopes of determining that 1) it's a change worth making and 2) all required people can add their consent.
@tmm1 @raggi @nahi @jf647 @cmdrkeene @skaes @alor @igrigorik @abonec @meh @gdb
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels