feat: default workflows part of all repositories

Author: sheplu

docs/rfc/0002-core-workflows.md

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+# Standard default CI/CD workflows for Express.js repositories
+
+## Summary
+
+This RFC proposes a standardized set of default GitHub Actions workflows that should exist in every repository within the Express.js organization. These workflows ensure consistent validation on code pushes, pull requests, and post-merge events, along with optional compatibility and maintenance checks. The goal is to guarantee consistent quality across projects while keeping workflows lightweight and maintainable.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Currently, each repository uses its own GitHub Actions setup, or in some cases none at all. This creates:
+
+- Inconsistent behavior across repositories  
+- Missed regressions in default branches  
+- Repeated maintenance effort  
+- Difficulty for new contributors to understand expectations  
+- No consistent testing against supported Node.js versions
+
+By introducing standard workflows, we ensure:
+
+- Consistent validation across repositories  
+- Predictable contributor experience  
+- Continued support for Node.js LTS policy  
+- Easier future migration to shared workflows
+
+## Detailed Explanation
+
+### Required Default Workflows
+
+| Workflow | Trigger | Required | Description |
+|----------|---------|----------|-------------|
+| **1. Push Validation** | `on: push` to non-default branches | ✅ Yes | Run tests, lint, and basic validation for fast feedback during development. |
+| **2. Pull Request Validation** | `on: pull_request` to `main`, `master`, or version branches | ✅ Yes | Ensures code is tested before merging. May include stricter checks than push validation. |
+| **3. Post-Merge / Default Branch Check** | `on: push` to `main` or release branches | ✅ Yes | Ensures the default branch remains passing after merge and runs on the official Node.js LTS version(s). |
+| **4. Manual Multi-Node.js Test** | `workflow_dispatch` | ✅ Yes (for core repos) | Allows manual execution of tests against multiple Node.js versions (e.g., 20, 22, 24) before releases or LTS changes. |
+| **5. Scheduled Compatibility Check** | `schedule:` (optional) | Optional | Runs periodically to test against latest dependencies or Node.js nightly builds. |
+| **6. Security / Dependency Audit** | Manual or scheduled | Optional | Runs `npm audit`, dependency checks, or license compliance. |
+| **7. Release Workflow** | Tag or manual trigger | Optional | Builds and publishes packages (only for repositories that publish to npm). |
+
+### Guiding Principles
+
+- Workflows should remain lightweight and fast.  
+- No mandatory CodeQL, coverage upload, or heavy tasks.  
+- All default workflows must be compatible with reusable workflows.  
+- Repositories may add extra workflows if needed but should not remove core workflows.
+
+## Rationale and Alternatives
+
+| Approach | Pros | Cons |
+|----------|------|------|
+| **Proposed: Minimal Standard Workflows** | Balanced, lightweight, ensures consistency | Requires migration across repositories |
+| Keep current undefined setup | No effort required | Inconsistency, higher risk of breakage |
+| Enforce strict CI (coverage, audit, CodeQL, etc.) | Maximum protection | Too heavy for small modules, discouraging contributions |
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Affected Repositories
+
+- All repositories under the Express.js organization that use or should use CI.
+
+### Steps
+
+1. Approve this RFC.  
+2. Create example workflow templates in `.ci-workflows/workflows/`.  
+3. Apply to core repositories:  
+   - expressjs/express  
+   - expressjs/router  
+   - expressjs/body-parser  
+4. Introduce shared workflows once this standard is normalized.  
+5. Document requirements in `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
+
+## Prior Art
+
+- GitHub recommends reusable organization workflows for consistency and maintenance.
+
+## Unresolved Questions
+
+- Which Node.js versions must be tested by default? (e.g., 22 + 24 vs 18 + 20 + 22 + LTS)  
+- Should push validation run on all branches or exclude `main`?  
+- Naming convention for workflows (`ci.yml`, `test.yml`, `validate.yml`)?  
+- Should `npm audit` or dependency checks be mandatory or optional?