Skip to content

Conversation

@dbrattli
Copy link
Collaborator

Pin Microsoft.Build transitive dependencies for now to fix CVE-2025-55247 and avoid warnings, or should we instead do it in the Buildalyzer 8.0.0-fable-001? Not sure where that package comes from?

Fable/src/Fable.Cli/Fable.Cli.fsproj : warning NU1903: Package 'Microsoft.Build' 17.10.4 has a known high severity vulnerability, https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3q9-fxm7-j8fq
Fable/src/Fable.Cli/Fable.Cli.fsproj : warning NU1903: Package 'Microsoft.Build.Tasks.Core' 17.10.29 has a known high severity vulnerability, https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3q9-fxm7-j8fq
Fable/src/Fable.Cli/Fable.Cli.fsproj : warning NU1903: Package 'Microsoft.Build.Utilities.Core' 17.10.29 has a known high severity vulnerability, https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3q9-fxm7-j8fq
Fable/src/Fable.Cli/Fable.Cli.fsproj : warning NU1903: Package 'Microsoft.Build' 17.10.4 has a known high severity vulnerability, https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3q9-fxm7-j8fq
Fable/src/Fable.Cli/Fable.Cli.fsproj : warning NU1903: Package 'Microsoft.Build.Tasks.Core' 17.10.29 has a known high severity vulnerability, https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3q9-fxm7-j8fq
Fable/src/Fable.Cli/Fable.Cli.fsproj : warning NU1903: Package 'Microsoft.Build.Utilities.Core' 17.10.29 has a known high severity vulnerability, https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3q9-fxm7-j8fq

Pin Microsoft.Build transitive dependencies to fix CVE-2025-55247
@ncave
Copy link
Collaborator

ncave commented Dec 18, 2025

@dbrattli It's from the Buildalyzer, unfortunately their latest release 8.0.0 is still vulnerable.

@dbrattli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ok, but should we then just pin them for now?

@ncave
Copy link
Collaborator

ncave commented Dec 18, 2025

@dbrattli Sure, perhaps we can do it as local package Buildalyzer 8.0.0-fable-002

@ncave
Copy link
Collaborator

ncave commented Dec 18, 2025

@dbrattli I wonder if we can eventually drop Buildalyzer altogether as legacy. The less dependencies, the better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants