Description
Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
- I have read the Contributing Guidelines on issues.
Motivation
A more solid proposal derived from #4625. I propose two Markdown-related lifecycles for plugins: configureMarkdownLoader and .getMarkdownComponents
configureMarkdownLoader
Status quo
Currently, every content plugin uses @docusaurus/mdx-loader and passes it through configureWebpack. The docs and blog plugins also host their own Markdown loaders, in order to access the file path -> URL mapping and convert MD links to URL links.
However, this means each plugin's data is completely sandboxed, all the way from content loading to route creation. A plugin can't access routes created by another plugin at any stage in its lifespan. In addition, this means duplicated logic in every plugin. After #5999, the remark plugins will be moved to a global config option, which has to be hooked into in every plugin.
This also means that linkification happens before any Remark plugin gets loaded, and people can't remap Markdown paths, as requested in #4039, because when the beforeDefaultRemarkPlugins get loaded, the Markdown links don't exist any more.
Resolution
I propose that we move the MDX loader to the core, just like the CSS loader or JS loader. This effectively means we treat MD as a first-class citizen in our architecture. And then, each plugin will pass in loader options that are aggregated together. This solves several problems:
- Plugins can access routes created by the others through an aggregated global
filePathToPermalinkmap. - The admonitions plugin doesn't have to be strangely injected from preset options into the plugin, but the theme can directly register remark plugins that are accessible for all content plugins. (The admonitions plugin being strongly coupled to the classic theme is actually very bad design, but in the future, we may create other theme-specific remark plugins?)
- We can easily create more global Markdown configurations in the future, even swapping out Markdown parsers or inserting additional middlewares, without duplicating logic across content plugins.
For example:
function pluginContentDocs() {
return {
configureMarkdown(content) {
return {
isIncluded: (filePath) => {
return content.allDocSources.includes(filePath);
},
metadataPath: (filePath) => {
const aliasedPath = aliasedSitePath(mdxPath, siteDir);
return path.join(dataDir, `${docuHash(aliasedPath)}.json`);
},
// Allows global linkification
getPermalink: (filePath) => {
return allDocs.find(doc => doc.source === filePath).permalink;
},
isMDXPartial: (filePath) => {
return createAbsoluteFilePathMatcher(options.exclude, contentDirs)(filePath);
},
// Stuff like remarkPlugins, staticDirs, etc. are no longer needed in plugin config
};
},
};
}The only problem is that some logic is ultimately plugin-specific. For example, how do we handle file-specific logic if the file queried is not handled by this plugin? My current solution is an isIncluded function. All configs are aggregated in a list, and for each file, the isIncluded callback is first called. If it returns true, then the rest of the callbacks are executed. All callbacks are called with filePath, but maybe we can also pass in fileContent if there's a use?
`getMarkdownComponents` is now unnecessary
getMarkdownComponents
Status quo
Currently, the classic theme registers global Markdown components through the MDXComponents. This is problematic, because other themes can't register components on top of this unless we solve #4530. Moreover, the API surface is very implicit to the user. This is ultimately just a register, not a component, and can't be wrapped like other components. (Although you can still use object spreading)
Resolution
I propose a new getMarkdownComponents that's like getThemePath. It returns a path to a component map, in the same shape as the current MDXComponents. The core would merge all component registers and generate it as a temp file. Anything that uses the MDXProvider just needs to import from the generated folder.
After some more thoughts, I don't think we need the getMarkdownComponents API. Instead, we will solve #4530, and allow each theme to wrap the previous one's MDXComponents (which I'm also considering to be refactored into a useMDXGlobals hook).
Self-service
- I'd be willing to do some initial work on this proposal myself.
Activity