I've been experimenting with OpenZL for pointcloud compression and find it significantly outperforms the best compression offered by parquet by more than 20% (compression ratio), so there is a strong motivation for writing my own file format and IO libraries. Parquet however offers its own benefits of:
- compatibility with a wide variety of query engines
- efficient remote queries via iceberg
- spatial queries via postgis, sedonadb, duckdb-spatial or pycanopy
I would love to have the best of both worlds. Is there any effort to integrate OpenZL with Parquet? Can I help at all?
I've been experimenting with OpenZL for pointcloud compression and find it significantly outperforms the best compression offered by parquet by more than 20% (compression ratio), so there is a strong motivation for writing my own file format and IO libraries. Parquet however offers its own benefits of:
I would love to have the best of both worlds. Is there any effort to integrate OpenZL with Parquet? Can I help at all?