diff --git a/apps/docs/blog/2024-10-10-designing-for-composition.mdx b/apps/docs/blog/2024-10-10-designing-for-composition.mdx
index 8c1bc5a93..eff85d585 100644
--- a/apps/docs/blog/2024-10-10-designing-for-composition.mdx
+++ b/apps/docs/blog/2024-10-10-designing-for-composition.mdx
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ However, component-based frameworks, such as React, largely sidestep any
 architectural issues with inline styles. Components are a layer of abstraction
 that enables code reuse without needing to write the same styles over and over
 again. This change was noticed early and was described in the original 
-[`CSS-in-JS` talk by _Christopher Cheadeu_](https://vimeo.com/116209150).
+[`CSS-in-JS` talk by _Christopher Chedeau_](https://vimeo.com/116209150).
 
 So, when it came to designing StyleX, we decided to model our styles after
 inline styles. To form a mental model, it can be helpful to think of StyleX