Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Great question. This is actually already handled here, where your training data is used to fit new atomistic references for fine-tuning. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When benchmarking the uma-s-1p1 model against my DFT dataset (task = OC20), I see a nice linear correlation with an energy offset since I used different DFT parameters to the ones used when constructing the OC20 dataset.
When finetuning, is this something I need to take into account? Is there somewhere I need to provide my own atomistic reference energies? Or is this accounted for somewhere in the codebase?
Many thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions