Skip to content

feat: License #409

Description

@nickjuntilla

What is the feature you would like to implement?
What is the license for your smart contracts? Is this OpenSource?

Why is this feature important?
I think it's important for us to have some clarity around the license so we can know if we can deploy for example on another blockchain. Can we expand on it? I think the ideal license for a decentralized OpenSource project would be MIT.

Will the protocol spec need to be updated??
Within protocol spec there should be a link to the License document.

Additional context
Right now the code is exposed and it appears to be open source, but there is no license, which can be confusing and also limiting.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

featNew feature request

Type

No type

Fields

No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions