Skip to content

Commit 80ba227

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #13959 from rmcdermo/master
FDS User Guide: add BLOWING CORRECTION to solid phase output table
2 parents e838729 + 5c92a53 commit 80ba227

File tree

1 file changed

+6
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+6
-5
lines changed

Manuals/FDS_User_Guide/FDS_User_Guide.tex

Lines changed: 6 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2280,14 +2280,14 @@ \subsubsection{Logarithmic Law of the Wall}
22802280
Refer to the FDS Tech Guide \cite{FDS_Tech_Guide} for further details of the formulation. To specify this heat transfer model for a particular surface, set \ct{HEAT_TRANSFER_MODEL} equal to \ct{'LOGLAW'} on the \ct{SURF} line. Note that the loglaw model is not well-suited for buoyant flows---it requires a well-resolved ``wind'' near the surface and is therefore mainly applicable to forced convection type flows with high grid resolution.
22812281

22822282
\subsubsection{Blowing Heat Transfer}
2283-
\label{blowing}
2283+
\label{info:blowing}
22842284

22852285
If a surface is emitting (``blowing'') or removing (``sucking'') gas, the flow normal to the surface disrupts the thermal boundary layer. Blowing tends to decrease the heat transfer coefficient while sucking tends to increase it. Adding \ct{BLOWING=T} to the \ct{SURF} line will account for this effect, except for DNS simulations where empirical heat transfer correlations are not used. When \ct{BLOWING=T}, the heat transfer coefficient is adjusted as follows~\cite{Plate_blowing}:
22862286
\begin{equation}
22872287
\Phi_h = \frac{\dot{m}'' c_p}{h}
22882288
\end{equation}
22892289
\begin{equation}
2290-
h_{\rm blowing} = \frac{\Phi_h}{{\rm e}^{\Phi_h}-1} h
2290+
h_{\rm blowing} = \underbrace{\left[\frac{\Phi_h}{{\exp}(\Phi_h)-1}\right]}_{{\mbox{\scriptsize \tt BLOWING CORRECTION}}} h
22912291
\end{equation}
22922292
where $h$ is the unadjusted heat transfer coefficient, $\dot{m}''$ is the mass flow rate per unit area (positive for blowing), and $c_p$ is the specific heat of the gas.
22932293

@@ -8700,7 +8700,7 @@ \subsection{Freezing the Output Value, Example Case: \ct{hrr_freeze}}
87008700
\subsection{Example Case: Heat Release Rate of a Spreading Fire}
87018701
\label{spreading_fire}
87028702

8703-
In this example, a fire spreads radially from a single point as directed by the parameters \ct{SPREAD_RATE} and \ct{XYZ} on a \ct{VENT} line. Usually, the user specifies the heat release rate per unit area (\ct{HRRPUA}) for each burning surface cell on the corresponding \ct{SURF} line, but in this case, a specific time \ct{RAMP} for the {\em total} heat release rate is specified. The following input lines show how the user-specified \ct{RAMP} called \ct{'HRR'} controls the total HRR of the growing fire. The key point is that the user-specified {\em total} HRR is divided by the area of burning surface, and this heat release rate per unit area is imposed on all burning cells. Normally FDS will adjust a mass flux input (\ct{MASS_FLUX}, \ct{HRRPUA} ,etc.) input to account for any differences in the area of the \ct{VENT} as specified with \ct{XB} and the area is it is actually resolved on the grid. In this case we are using control functions to determine the heat release rate. In this case the control logic is directly computing the required flux based on the area as resolved so no additional correction is needed. When false, the \ct{AREA_ADJUST} flag prevents any additional adjustment. Regardless of the fact that the spreading fire reaches a barrier and is stopped from spreading radially, the user-specified \ct{RAMP} controls the HRR, as shown in Fig.~\ref{spreading_fire_hrr}.
8703+
In this example, a fire spreads radially from a single point as directed by the parameters \ct{SPREAD_RATE} and \ct{XYZ} on a \ct{VENT} line. Usually, the user specifies the heat release rate per unit area (\ct{HRRPUA}) for each burning surface cell on the corresponding \ct{SURF} line, but in this case, a specific time \ct{RAMP} for the {\em total} heat release rate is specified. The following input lines show how the user-specified \ct{RAMP} called \ct{'HRR'} controls the total HRR of the growing fire. The key point is that the user-specified {\em total} HRR is divided by the area of burning surface, and this heat release rate per unit area is imposed on all burning cells. Normally FDS will adjust a mass flux input (\ct{MASS_FLUX}, \ct{HRRPUA} ,etc.) input to account for any differences in the area of the \ct{VENT} as specified with \ct{XB} and the area is it is actually resolved on the grid. In this case we are using control functions to determine the heat release rate. In this case the control logic is directly computing the required flux based on the area as resolved so no additional correction is needed. When false, the \ct{AREA_ADJUST} flag prevents any additional adjustment. Regardless of the fact that the spreading fire reaches a barrier and is stopped from spreading radially, the user-specified \ct{RAMP} controls the HRR, as shown in Fig.~\ref{spreading_fire_hrr}.
87048704
\begin{lstlisting}
87058705
&VENT SURF_ID='FIRE', XB=1.0,7.0,1.0,7.0,0.0,0.0, XYZ=3.0,3.0,0.0, SPREAD_RATE=0.1, AREA_ADJUST=F /
87068706

@@ -11447,15 +11447,16 @@ \section{Solid Phase Output Quantities}
1144711447
\endhead
1144811448
\ct{ADIABATIC SURFACE TEMPERATURE} & Section~\ref{info:AST} & $^\circ$C & B,D \\ \hline
1144911449
\ct{AMPUA}$^2$ & Section~\ref{bucket_test_1} & kg/m$^2$ & B,D \\ \hline
11450-
\ct{AMPUA_Z}$^1$ & Section~\ref{bucket_test_1} & kg/m$^2$ & B,D \\ \hline
11450+
\ct{AMPUA_Z}$^1$ & Section~\ref{bucket_test_1} & kg/m$^2$ & B,D \\ \hline
1145111451
\ct{BACK WALL TEMPERATURE} & Section~\ref{info:BACK} & $^\circ$C & B,D \\ \hline
11452+
\ct{BLOWING CORRECTION} & Section~\ref{info:blowing} & & B,D \\ \hline
1145211453
\ct{BURNING RATE} & Mass loss rate of fuel & \unit{kg/(m^2.s)} & B,D \\ \hline
1145311454
\ct{CONDENSATION HEAT FLUX} & Section~\ref{info:condensation} & \unit{kW/m^2} & B,D \\ \hline
1145411455
\ct{CONVECTIVE HEAT FLUX} & Section~\ref{info:heat_flux} & \unit{kW/m^2} & B,D \\ \hline
1145511456
\ct{CONVECTIVE HEAT FLUX GAUGE} & Section~\ref{info:heat_flux} & \unit{kW/m^2} & B,D \\ \hline
1145611457
{\scriptsize\tt CONVECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER REGIME} & Section \ref{info:convection} & & B,D \\ \hline
1145711458
\ct{CPUA}$^2$ & Section~\ref{bucket_test_1} & \unit{kW/m^2} & B,D \\ \hline
11458-
\ct{CPUA_Z}$^1$ & Section~\ref{bucket_test_1} & \unit{kW/m^2} & B,D \\ \hline
11459+
\ct{CPUA_Z}$^1$ & Section~\ref{bucket_test_1} & \unit{kW/m^2} & B,D \\ \hline
1145911460
\ct{DEPOSITION VELOCITY} & Section~\ref{info:deposition} & m/s & B,D \\ \hline
1146011461
\ct{FRICTION VELOCITY} & Section~\ref{info:yplus} & m/s & B,D \\ \hline
1146111462
\ct{GAUGE HEAT FLUX} & Section~\ref{info:heat_flux} & \unit{kW/m^2} & B,D \\ \hline

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)