SOTA Award

[PY2AD]

On this release .47, SOTA Awards is empty, show me all zero qso.

[foldynl]

tested and everything is displayed as it should. Check whether a valid mode is selected and the "Confirmed by" checkbox is checked.

[PY2AD]

All checked here, I am using windows version. I have a friend who uses Linux, and comparing it to his, we see that some things that work on Linux don't work the same way on Windows.

I exported my log to Log4OM for testing, and SOTA appears there.

[foldynl]

please, send me the export. Send me please, a screenshot of your active station profile setting.

[foldynl]

Please remember that simply "not working" is not useful for me when I need to find a problem.

[PY2AD]

[logbook.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24193838/logbook.zip)

[aa5sh]

I wonder if for some reason the SOTA list isn't loaded in his database properly.

[foldynl]

@PY2AD Zip is not found...please, could you resend it?

@aa5sh I also think he has a corrupted DB, but I want to rule out some other problem.

[PY2AD]

logbook.zip

If dont work, send me an email, please

[foldynl]

@PY2AD I can download it now.

@aa5sh Michael, can you confirm that it works on MacOS and v0.47 ? Linux is not affected by this issue.

[foldynl]

@aa5sh I found something unusual. still testing.

[PY2AD]

Thanks @foldynl

I open an suggests & ideias, a discussion to help you on windows version.... I will test here, then I pass some issues differents

[foldynl]

@PY2AD : Your export does not contain any SOTA_REF fields in the ADIF. Therefore, there is nothing in the Award dialog. What makes you think you have SOTA records in your log?

[PY2AD]

@PY2AD : Your export does not contain any SOTA_REF fields in the ADIF. Therefore, there is nothing in the Award dialog. What makes you think you have SOTA records in your log?

Beacuse I tested in other log and it work.... Unless this data was lost during import, probably due to differences in field names.

[foldynl]

it would be good to look at the source ADI. There must be a sota_ref field there

[foldynl]

I can see only a few records with the Log4OM-specific field app_l4ong_qso_award_references, which is used only by Log4OM. This field is application-specific - not in ADIF spec.

[PY2AD]

Yes, Log4om was my old log, before Qlog

[aa5sh]

Can you show from within Log4OM where the Sota Reference is stored? Or give an example? I got a empty list with the log file but like you I don't see any SOTA references.

[foldynl]

It might be good to see the original ADI file from Log4OM.

[aa5sh]

I installed Log4OM and may a test entry and added the SOTA and when I exported it did create the correct <SOTA_REF> adit entry. I didn't try to import it but I have no doubt it would have worked. So I'm not sure what is going on @PY2AD I'd still like to see an example ADI from Log4OM to see where it was stored. It was a little quirky on where to put in that app.

[PY2AD]

Hello @aa5sh,

I used Log4OM Portable before migrating to Qlog. For a while I used Qlog on Linux, then I switched to using it on Windows because I use Steam on Windows. I don't know the difference between Qlog for Linux and for Windows, but I understand that the Windows version is adapted, since Qlog is Linux by default.

I tested my database again in Log4OM, and my SOTA no longer appears. I believe that in some export/import process I deleted this field, probably Log4OM, I wouldn't know for sure.

I used this Log4OM <> Qlog import/export and vice versa a bit, because I do some batch corrections through Log4OM due to the program's ease of use; perhaps that's the only sensible explanation, having lost or reset this field in one of these movements.

The main features that attract me to Qlog are having everything I need on the screen, without having to navigate through the program, and the fact that it uses all callsigns in a single database, thus having a single count for awards. This makes a big difference when choosing a logbook.

Do you think I should have a dual boot to use Qlog on Linux?

[aa5sh]

All the versions should be the same between Operating systems. Only difference is windows has OmniRig support.

…

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 8:46 AM PY2AD ***@***.***> wrote: Hello @aa5sh <https://github.com/aa5sh>, I used Log4OM Portable before migrating to Qlog. For a while I used Qlog on Linux, then I switched to using it on Windows because I use Steam on Windows. I don't know the difference between Qlog for Linux and for Windows, but I understand that the Windows version is adapted, since Qlog is Linux by default. I tested my database again in Log4OM, and my SOTA no longer appears. I believe that in some export/import process I deleted this field, probably Log4OM, I wouldn't know for sure. I used this Log4OM <> Qlog import/export and vice versa a bit, because I do some batch corrections through Log4OM due to the program's ease of use; perhaps that's the only sensible explanation, having lost or reset this field in one of these movements. The main features that attract me to Qlog are having everything I need on the screen, without having to navigate through the program, and the fact that it uses all callsigns in a single database, thus having a single count for awards. This makes a big difference when choosing a logbook. Do you think I should have a dual boot to use Qlog on Linux? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#860 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUEEMXSYBB4F3VM23D6DQRD4DKRNNAVCNFSM6AAAAACPEEAFYGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTKMZTGU4TEMQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>