301&302 vs 307&308

[andreineculau]

given 307 & 308, is there a good reason beyond “legacy” compatibility to support 301 & 302?

the diagram went KISS and chose 307 & 308 in 49cc4b7

[andreineculau]

relevant:

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/160
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8138137/http-post-request-receives-a-302-should-the-redirect-request-be-a-get
http://www.mnot.net/javascript/xmlhttprequest/

[andreineculau]

From https://twitter.com/dret/status/384688006788952064
@andreineculau if the behavior of the moved resource changed (new URI template, for example), maybe it makes sense to GET it first.