First off, thanks for taking the time to contribute!
Your feedback & discussions are always welcome!
Just reach out to us via GitHub discussions, and we will be happy to chat about your ideas, suggestions, or questions.
Below, you will find a brief guide to evolving the AI4L prompt and customizing it for your needs.
The list of experts prioritized for the "Recommended Reading" section can be modified by changing AI4L.md (9.5)
-
Use a CLI Environment
-
Agents & skills are located in the
.claude/.opencodefolder -
After modifying files, use "/check" to check all AI4L files for inconsistencies or errors. The skill should be auto-loaded by the CLI.
-
The CLI might need a
/clearor even an exit from the CLI to reload the changed agent or skill code
-
Use
/er create <topic>to create an evidence review -
Use
/er auditto audit the review -
Inspect the resulting QA.md for any errors, inconsistencies, or misbehavior of the auditing AI.
-
Fix issues by improving the audit instruction at the beginning of "AI4L.md" and throughout the document as
inline comments for the auditor. -
This can be done interactively, in dialogue with the AI itself, by asking it how to improve the prompt to avoid a particular mistake or misunderstanding in the future.
-
Repeat until satisfied
-
Proceed to step 2 ONLY WHEN repeatedly happy with the behavior of the QA process itself.
-
When unhappy with the actual content of the ER, interactively work with the AI on how to improve / change / add checklist items to steer the generating AI in the desired direction.
-
Remember the reverse, QA based approach as described in README.md
-
QA items work best when they are not only negative (DOES NOT ...) but also clearly express what is expected and give a precise example.
-
Repeat the cycle " Create > Audit > Improve audit checklist items > ... " until satisfied
Check out our Lessons Learned document for insights and best practices.