Any reason why GPLv2 is used over GPLv3?

[tuxxy]

See title.

Also, why not AGPLv3? It's nice to have links to the source code in the site in some way.

[dannycolin]

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.

@tuxxy have you ever read the GPL license ?

[tuxxy]

To answer your condescending question, yes I have. My question still stands. Why ship the GPLv2 when the GPLv3 is available (and recommended).

…

On Jan 8, 2017 14:27, "Danny Colin" ***@***.***> wrote: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. @tuxxy <https://github.com/tuxxy> have you ever read the GPL license ? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADbn7iskrX1fa8IhquSrPGDpx9aReD4Cks5rQVTPgaJpZM4JmneJ> .

[forrestwilkins]

I actually hadn't realized there was a newer version but I'll definitely make it a point to update to that soon. You may notice either the site is down or redirecting to somewhere else now as I've been working on another project, Social Maya, though I have moved all the features and source code of Anrcho to that repository.