@@ -20,43 +20,54 @@ prioritization or customer impact.
2020## Project status
2121
2222fullsend-ai passed its MVP milestone on April 23, 2026. The project is
23- early-stage and actively onboarding its first users.
23+ in active adoption, executing against revised 90-day goals (target: June
24+ 30, 2026) focused on bug-fix workflow adoption, feature refinement
25+ capabilities, and evaluating trustworthiness of agent behaviors.
26+
27+ A key near-term focus is multi-platform support (especially GitLab),
28+ driven by demand from multiple customers and use cases.
29+
30+ All agentic workflows are hybrid — teams use fullsend alongside manual
31+ and locally-driven methods. Auto-merge is not an expectation at this
32+ phase; agent-produced code is reviewed by humans before merging.
2433
2534> ** Staleness warning:** The customer details below are a point-in-time
26- > snapshot. Where possible, commands are provided to fetch live data.
27- > Static content should be periodically reviewed and updated.
35+ > snapshot (last updated June 2026). Where possible, commands are
36+ > provided to fetch live data. Static content should be periodically
37+ > reviewed and updated.
2838
2939## Strategic customers
3040
31- There are three strategic external customers listed below. The
32- fullsend-ai org itself is also a user (dogfooding), but the external
33- customers are the ones that matter for prioritization.
41+ The strategic customers are listed below. The fullsend-ai org itself is
42+ also a user (dogfooding), but the external customers are the ones that
43+ matter for prioritization.
3444
35- All three are high priority. Issues and feedback from these customers
36- are direct signals of the new-user onboarding experience and should be
37- treated with urgency. Other users are welcome and should be supported,
38- but these three take precedence when prioritizing work.
45+ Issues and feedback from these customers are direct signals of the
46+ onboarding experience and should be treated with urgency. Other users
47+ are welcome and should be supported, but strategic customers take
48+ precedence when prioritizing work.
3949
4050### 1. konflux-ci
4151
42- Several repositories in the ` konflux-ci ` GitHub org are onboarded. To
43- get the current list of enrolled repositories, run:
52+ Many repositories in the ` konflux-ci ` GitHub org are onboarded — the
53+ number has expanded significantly since initial onboarding. To get the
54+ current list of enrolled repositories, run:
4455
4556``` bash
4657gh api repos/konflux-ci/.fullsend/contents/config.yaml \
4758 --jq ' .content' | base64 -d | yq .
4859```
4960
50- We expect a few dozen more konflux-ci repositories to onboard during
51- May 2026 .
61+ The 90-day goal is to continue scaling usage across konflux-ci and to
62+ incorporate feature refinement into the existing process .
5263
53- ### 2. openkaiden (via @deboer-tim )
64+ ### 2. redhat-developer (via @deboer-tim )
5465
55- @deboer-tim is evaluating fullsend-ai for the openkaiden project. He
56- created a personal fork org —
57- [ openkaiden-fullsend ] ( https://github.com/openkaiden-fullsend ) — so he
58- can test the integration without disrupting the real openkaiden org's
59- development workflow while fullsend-ai is still young .
66+ @deboer-tim is the primary contact for the Developer teams. The goal
67+ has shifted from openkaiden to onboarding 2 or more repos from the
68+ ` redhat-developer ` GitHub org. He previously used a personal fork org —
69+ [ openkaiden-fullsend ] ( https://github.com/openkaiden-fullsend ) — for
70+ early testing .
6071
6172Issues he has filed:
6273[ fullsend-ai/fullsend issues by deboer-tim] ( https://github.com/fullsend-ai/fullsend/issues?q=is%3Aissue+author%3Adeboer-tim ) .
@@ -71,9 +82,29 @@ demonstrate to other guacsec maintainers what the workflow looks like
7182and whether the platform should be considered safe. Trust and
7283transparency are key concerns for this customer.
7384
74- As of April 2026, guacsec has not yet onboarded (no ` .fullsend ` repo
75- exists). @mrizzi has not filed issues directly but is mentioned in
76- issues [ #457 ] ( https://github.com/fullsend-ai/fullsend/issues/457 ) and
85+ Onboarding guacsec upstream is a 90-day goal (target: June 30, 2026).
86+ The plan is for fullsend to be installed in at least one guacsec repo,
87+ with Red Hat P&D paying for inference, and upstream maintainers agreeing
88+ to try it.
89+
90+ @mrizzi has not filed issues directly but is mentioned in issues
91+ [ #457 ] ( https://github.com/fullsend-ai/fullsend/issues/457 ) and
7792[ #459 ] ( https://github.com/fullsend-ai/fullsend/issues/459 ) , which
7893relate to local execution and pre-adoption evaluation — likely driven
7994by his need to demo the platform safely.
95+
96+ ### 4. RHDH / Developer teams (via @durandom )
97+
98+ @durandom and the RHDH (Red Hat Developer Hub) team have started using
99+ fullsend. The Developer teams are a 90-day goal for bug-fix workflow
100+ adoption, though onboarding is currently blocked on reducing install
101+ overhead and simplifying customization options. Unblocking these teams
102+ is a priority for the fullsend team in June 2026.
103+
104+ ### 5. fullsend-playground (new interest via @ascerra 's demo)
105+
106+ @ascerra ran a demo on June 3, 2026 inviting people to try fullsend
107+ via the ` fullsend-playground ` GitHub org. This has generated a large
108+ number of new interested users checking out the project. These are
109+ early explorers — not yet strategic customers — but their feedback is
110+ valuable signal on the out-of-box experience and should be monitored.
0 commit comments