Skip to content

Putting cross-rig routing on hold for an architecture discussion #3055

@maphew

Description

@maphew

Putting #2954 on hold for an architecture discussion. Cross-rig routing was deliberately removed in d762920, and reintroducing it (even at narrower scope) needs consensus before merging.

Specific concerns:

  • routes.jsonl has no schema or versioning
  • No path-traversal validation on route targets
  • No circular-route detection
  • The env var override (BEADS_DOLT_SERVER_DATABASE) is implicit and easy to misuse

The implementation quality is good -- this is not a code quality issue, it is a design direction question. Let us discuss in an issue before proceeding.

Originally posted by @steveyegge in #2954 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions