Perhaps we should try to align it more with the Datafusion API?
So we'll have Area instead of area, plus Area::return_type and Area::process_array? Something like that. Trying to look forward towards having more udfs in more bindings, not just datafusion.
Perhaps we'll vendor something like ColumnarValue into geoarrow-geo to mimic the DataFusion API?
Perhaps we should try to align it more with the Datafusion API?
So we'll have
Areainstead ofarea, plusArea::return_typeandArea::process_array? Something like that. Trying to look forward towards having more udfs in more bindings, not just datafusion.Perhaps we'll vendor something like
ColumnarValueintogeoarrow-geoto mimic the DataFusion API?