Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I don't know what will happen if you do that, but I encourage you to try and report back. If it works, you can issue a pull request |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Thanks @andersp , I am trying it out and it seems to be working. I will make a PR soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, I looked at the part of code that fits a constant Q with the least squares scheme. It seems to me the same routine can be used to fit an arbitrary frequency-dependent Q by replacing Qs (Qp) with the desired Q values on the following line of code:
https://github.com/geodynamics/sw4/blob/efbf019501728ea89313f5d94ab982173954c574/src/EW.C#LL7939C1-L7939C25
I understand the number of mechanisms required to achieve a intended Q law within a acceptable error bound may be different that the implemented and tested constant Q case. I was wondering whether this thought is true and whether there are resultant pitfalls? Thanks a lot!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions