Requesting information on New Releases for GeoHealthCheck #498
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
@AnmolVirdi thanks for heads up! We do plan new releases, it is only we have little time. But I can see we need version upgrades. Is there any way you could issue a PR? All help is welcome! @tomkralidis . |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @justb4, I'd be happy to take a look at it. Actually, we'll have completely refactor dependency on |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@AnmolVirdi working on this, see #495 and #496 and related PRs. In Ubuntu 24.04 with Python 3.12.3 think still managing with Paver, but Paver needs to be phased out..Hold on.. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Team,
Wanted to check in if we can expect any new major releases for
GeoHealthCheck?The last major release
v0.9.0was around 2 years ago and has issues with latestpython3[3.12,3.13] versions.Sharing an examples:
paverhad its last official release in December, 2017: https://pypi.org/project/Paver/1.3.4/There are certain python libraries which paver uses and have been removed or completely refactored. One of those examples:
Impis no longer supported].pavercan not support >Python 3.10versions.GeoHealthCheckrelies on Paver (dependency for admin tool) these compatibility issues will affect its functionality in environments running Python 3.10 or later.GeoHealthCheckwill have to refactor their dependency on paver to support newer python variants.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions