Expanding/overriding the accepted URL syntax #9547
Unanswered
pluiedev
asked this question in
Feature Requests, Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Commenting with the word “URL scheme” so it comes up in searches. (You said “schemas”) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Successor to #4379.
Users should be able to extend the URL matcher to consider more valid URLs. Our current URL regex has a fixed list of schemas and overall an overly stringent syntax1, and it makes sense that sometimes the default matcher doesn't suffice.
Footnotes
Mostly because parsing URLs is non-trivial enough that I'm not sure if they can be parsed by a regular language in the non-specialized cases. ↩
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions