Revert Part

[Richardson-Chong]

Thanks for your invential method. And can you apply the revert part that for the ground-disappeared weakness of only remove part.

[qweesiic]

yes, i also found nothing about revert part in the source code . could you share this part? thanks

[Richardson-Chong]

After reading your paper, I infer your intention in revert is that compare the differences in range between the dynamic points been removed ans the series of low resolution rimg. Is that right?

[TongxingJin]

After reading your paper, I infer your intention in revert is that compare the differences in range between the dynamic points been removed ans the series of low resolution rimg. Is that right?

I do agree with you. Have you ever tried this idea?

[Richardson-Chong]

I tried in the same way as remove, and it worked. But I didn't check the precision and compared the situations with eyes instead- v -

[TongxingJin]

I tried in the same way as remove, and it worked. But I didn't check the precision and compared the situations with eyes instead- v -

Did you compare the rimg of dynamic points with all of the scans as REMOVE ? How about the pixel resolution you set?

[gisbi-kim]

dear @Richardson-Chong and all guys,
sorry for the late response.
The reverting part has been incorporated within ltremovert code (see https://github.com/gisbi-kim/lt-mapper/tree/main/ltremovert)
but not committed to this repo yet.