Description
Hello!
I'm reporting what I believe to be a bug in GitHub's SARIF consumption. This bug is probably happening somewhere deeper in GitHub's SARIF consumption machinery but upload-sarif
is the main user-facing entrypoint for that machinery, so I'm filing the report here. Please let me know if a better discussion venue exists and I'd be happy to continue this elsewhere 🙂
Description
GitHub's documentation says the following about paths in SARIF inputs:
Code scanning interprets results that are reported with relative paths as relative to the root of the repository analyzed. If a result contains an absolute URI, the URI is converted to a relative URI. The relative URI can then be matched against a file committed to the repository.
This, combined with the fact that SARIF stipulates RFC 3986 for artifactLocation
URIs suggests that relative paths should be able to include .
and ..
, as these path components are well-defined in RFC 3986.
However, if a SARIF file contains a relative URI like ./foo/bar
, GitHub appears to fail to resolve that URL to a path in the repository being scanned. This results in suboptimal finding presentation:
- Findings are not rendered on PRs, since GitHub doesn't think the finding URLs match repository paths;
- Findings are rendered under "Code scanning alerts" but show "Preview unavailable" instead of a proper synopsis/extraction of the source file.
Here is a screenshot of the above behavior, demonstrating the "Preview unavailable" behavior because the path (./tests/integration/test-data/issue-612-repro/action.yml
) starts with a ./
:

For contrast, here's a similar finding rendering correctly because it doesn't begin with ./
:

Expected behavior
I expect GitHub's SARIF ingestion to handle URIs that begin with (or contain) relative references, since SARIF stipulates RFC 3986 for URIs and RFC 3986 permits relative references. More generally, I believe many code-scanning tools produce relative references (like ./foo
) by default and would benefit from not having to specialize their handling for GitHub's SARIF consumer.
Actual behavior
Relative URIs like foo/bar
work correctly (resolving relative to the repository root), while relative URIs like ./foo/bar
do not work correctly.
Workarounds
The primary workarounds here are:
- "Normalize" relative URIs from
./foo/bar
tofoo/bar
. This is possible, but non-trivial in the general case (e.g../foo/bar/../baz
), and requires more pre-processing on the generated SARIF than the specification stipulates. - Switch entirely to absolute URIs, and use SARIF's features (like
invocations[0].workingDirectory.uri
) to help GitHub ingest and transform paths into appropriate relative URIs. I've had limited success making this work: the SARIF ingestor appears to be very fickle about absolute paths.
Overall, I think both of these workarounds are non-ideal, and add additional burden to SARIF producers to pre-process their inputs/offer a GitHub specific "quirks mode" beyond what SARIF stipulates. I think it would be fantastic if GitHub could instead support these kinds of relative paths!
Additional context
I ran into this behavior within zizmor, which supports SARIF as an output format and encourages people to use it when integrating with GitHub. Some original issue context: woodruffw/zizmor#604, woodruffw/zizmor#571.
Additionally, I've observed that GitHub's behavior around equivalent relative paths (e.g. foo/bar
and ./foo/bar
) is somewhat mixed: ./foo/bar
doesn't produce a preview, but results for foo/bar
and ./foo/bar
are deduplicated against each other. That makes me think that some degree of normalization/equivalence checking is happening in GitHub's SARIF processing, just not at the point needed to handle previews correctly.
Please let me know if there's any other information I can provide!