State correct permissions for requesting a reviewer via the API

[NovemberTang]

Code of Conduct

• I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/rest/pulls/review-requests?apiVersion=2022-11-28#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

The docs for this request say that the only required permission for this request is pull-requests:write. When I tried to request a review from a team using an app with this permission scope, I got the following error message, which was quite obscure, only vaguely hinting that it might be trying to validate a team slug. "errorMessage": "Validation Failed: \"Could not resolve to a node with the global id of 'BUNCH_OF_RANDOM_CHARACTERS'.

I fixed this by applying the permission members:read to the GitHub App making the request, and I think it would be helpful to amend the docs to state that this permission is required for the request to succeed. I think it also might be be useful to indicate that the object that has failed to validate is the team slug, if that is the source of the error (which is just an educated guess)

Additional information

Please see the following screenshot

[nguyenalex836]

@NovemberTang Thank you for raising this issue! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ Our team will provide feedback regarding the best next steps for this issue - thanks for your patience! 💛

[Jpplabon]

curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docker/scout-cli/main/install.sh -o install-scout.sh
sh install-scout.sha

[Jpplabon]

cat ~/my_password.txt | docker login --username foo --password-stdin

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening an issue! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

[TIMBER2024]

<@>

[nguyenalex836]

@NovemberTang Hello! 👋 Thank you so much for your patience while our SME team reviewed. They agree with your assessment, and that logically it makes sense members:read would be needed 💛

Would you be open to raising a PR to amend our docs? If not, no problem at all - we can open this to the community ✨